As other people have said, everyone you work with here is at the top of their game; succeeding here is to succeed anywhere.
You can build autonomously. There is not a ton of bureaucracy; you have the ability to directly impact users and work on visible features.
Very fast-paced development. A couple of weeks from idea to rollout is usual.
The features you build here are used by a huge number of people.
You need to be very effective at managing your time. A day can seem to go by in an instant with such a busy schedule.
There are so many things happening and things move so quickly it can be a challenge to maintain proficiency with the full stack.
Keep doing what you are doing; what we do will be necessary for the world moving into the future.
Overall, it was super frustrating. Apparently, I passed the panel interview, but they tried to position me for a different role. I had to wait two to three weeks for clarity. This was a very poor recruiter experience. I probably don't want to interv
The recruiter was nice and reached out to me. I scheduled a technical phone interview, and the interviewer asked me to code online, where I could submit the code and run test cases. I had a few issues with the syntax. I completed one of the coding q
The interview process included a standard technical phone screen followed by an onsite interview. The onsite consisted of: * Two coding questions * An architecture question * A "bar raiser" interview, which was essentially a business conversat
Overall, it was super frustrating. Apparently, I passed the panel interview, but they tried to position me for a different role. I had to wait two to three weeks for clarity. This was a very poor recruiter experience. I probably don't want to interv
The recruiter was nice and reached out to me. I scheduled a technical phone interview, and the interviewer asked me to code online, where I could submit the code and run test cases. I had a few issues with the syntax. I completed one of the coding q
The interview process included a standard technical phone screen followed by an onsite interview. The onsite consisted of: * Two coding questions * An architecture question * A "bar raiser" interview, which was essentially a business conversat