All people from the engineering side are amazing and fun to work with; performance reviews are a great way to get your salary bumped up once or even twice a year, and they are very chill regarding PTO.
I would say when you start you literally have no clue what is going on. You need to ask and research a lot to understand what is happening on your team. This is a good way to test how well you can work with little info, but I personally am not a fan of this.
You guys are rocking.
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 weeks. I had a phone call with a recruiter, after which they scheduled a LeetCode-style coding problem for 1 hour. I am not certain if they had the expectation of solving 2 problems in 1 hou
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. They give you a very lengthy problem description that essentially boils down to writing ~4-5 if-statements to verify different conditions that are present in the problem statement. So brush up
I applied online. Another candidate mentioned this, but it bears repeating: the first interview is a coding screen conducted with another developer. They provide a two-part problem: * Part One is a dense, "real-world" scenario that ultimately boils
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 weeks. I had a phone call with a recruiter, after which they scheduled a LeetCode-style coding problem for 1 hour. I am not certain if they had the expectation of solving 2 problems in 1 hou
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. They give you a very lengthy problem description that essentially boils down to writing ~4-5 if-statements to verify different conditions that are present in the problem statement. So brush up
I applied online. Another candidate mentioned this, but it bears repeating: the first interview is a coding screen conducted with another developer. They provide a two-part problem: * Part One is a dense, "real-world" scenario that ultimately boils