Really good. I highly recommend it.
None. Place is the best.
The interview process included: * One screener * One "high level chat" * Three interviews with EMs * One interview with a PM * One system design In total, SEVEN interviews were conducted. It seems the interview process is a vestigial holdover from
1. Screening interview with recruiter. 2. 45-minute technical interview. (3 QA engineers) and 1 Dev. 3. 45-minute onsite interview. 4. Final interview with Director after onsite. The team was fast to communicate and schedule interviews.
First round: Standard coding interview. Virtual Onsite -> Received a long email with so many topics to prepare for the onsite. During the onsite, all 4 interviews were about coding, DS/Algorithms. 3 out of 4 ended up being DFS/BFS for Tree/Graph. No
The interview process included: * One screener * One "high level chat" * Three interviews with EMs * One interview with a PM * One system design In total, SEVEN interviews were conducted. It seems the interview process is a vestigial holdover from
1. Screening interview with recruiter. 2. 45-minute technical interview. (3 QA engineers) and 1 Dev. 3. 45-minute onsite interview. 4. Final interview with Director after onsite. The team was fast to communicate and schedule interviews.
First round: Standard coding interview. Virtual Onsite -> Received a long email with so many topics to prepare for the onsite. During the onsite, all 4 interviews were about coding, DS/Algorithms. 3 out of 4 ended up being DFS/BFS for Tree/Graph. No