Good company if you are in the right team, good work-life balance. However, with huge attrition and an inability to hire new talent, it's getting worse.
Used to be good in compensation, but the market has skipped ahead. Good performers who have been in the company for some time are not valued much now, and they are attracted towards new and shiny opportunities.
Used to have a good social value, but the CEO seemed to be more in concurrence with Roe v. Wade being overturned, so very disappointing.
There are too many silos, and O&I is mostly terrible. It's so hard to get anything done as a broader team, and each smaller team works with its own agendas, with no willingness or vision for the greater good of the company.
The tech organization spends money in the wrong place and is not ambitious enough.
Recruitment is also very bad, causing an inability to hire in a time when attrition is very high.
Return to the roots – be a great company for the people. Hire right and retain the good people.
Break down silos in work and value everyone, not just the new.
The interview process included a first-round HackerRank assessment, followed by second and third phone calls. The phone screens were relatively easy, and everyone was very nice. However, the process took a very long time. It would have been prefera
Got sent the OA. The first question was not too difficult. The second one wasn't difficult either, but it did take longer. The third and fourth were very difficult for me.
I had three interviews. The first was a preliminary technical interview. The second was a more challenging technical interview. The third was a behavioral interview. I thought the technical challenge questions were all fairly straightforward. The b
The interview process included a first-round HackerRank assessment, followed by second and third phone calls. The phone screens were relatively easy, and everyone was very nice. However, the process took a very long time. It would have been prefera
Got sent the OA. The first question was not too difficult. The second one wasn't difficult either, but it did take longer. The third and fourth were very difficult for me.
I had three interviews. The first was a preliminary technical interview. The second was a more challenging technical interview. The third was a behavioral interview. I thought the technical challenge questions were all fairly straightforward. The b