Low-level management is typically very talented and cares about employees. Salary can be more than fair. Some very talented technicians and business-side people can be found at ViSA. Plus, you can learn a lot about the payments industry.
Mid-level spends too much time involved in low-level operational activities.
Even the most senior techies are not encouraged to take risks or be rewarded for risks.
CEO and minions often seem to agree, but mid-level appears to pervert what the CEO wants.
Environment is HIGHLY political, and based on the banking world circa 1985. Don't even think about non-waterfall development.
Heavy use of project managers, who are often clueless as to which industry they are in.
Bonuses seem unrelated to actual work performed and are not doled out by direct management. Rather, they are given out by mid-level managers who base performance on "feelings," not work completed.
The CEO and one layer below should leave SFO and go visit the troops directly. VISA's success is ultimately being limited by mid-level managers who are perverting your corporate goals.
Fill in the table and forms online, and then wait for an email stating that I need to take an online test. There were 10 multiple-selection questions and 3 algorithm questions. The first question was about bit computing. It presented a number and ask
Spoke to a recruiter for about 3 minutes. A very strange interaction, unlike any other recruiter I have ever spoken to. They seemed disinterested from the first moment of the call. Wasted my time.
Recruiters were very helpful and quick with communication throughout the 3-week process. * After a career fair at my university, I was offered an on-campus screening interview for the next day. * I took a HackerRank assessment a week later. The
Fill in the table and forms online, and then wait for an email stating that I need to take an online test. There were 10 multiple-selection questions and 3 algorithm questions. The first question was about bit computing. It presented a number and ask
Spoke to a recruiter for about 3 minutes. A very strange interaction, unlike any other recruiter I have ever spoken to. They seemed disinterested from the first moment of the call. Wasted my time.
Recruiters were very helpful and quick with communication throughout the 3-week process. * After a career fair at my university, I was offered an on-campus screening interview for the next day. * I took a HackerRank assessment a week later. The