Recruiters think that they are the king of the world. (dhidha is a hint; if you are an employee of Walmart, you would understand whom I am referring.)
The worst thing you will experience is that "you will get a bigger surprise on the joining day as they would put you in a different team than the team for which you were hired." If you do a survey on this, why people at Walmart leave in 1-1.5 years, many employees would come up with the above reason.
They have degraded their standard of the hiring process. A few years back, they used to hire only from tier-1 colleges; now it has become like anyone with a Java tech stack can be part of Walmart. Okay, it's a good thing that you are giving a good opportunity to everyone. But have some plans for the people whom you hire.
Coming to the point which would signify the review title:
I was part of a team which had two sets of leaders: IDC & US. My team was an experimental team to experiment with a new model of working. This idea had come from US leaders. IDC leaders were so mean towards this; they were not ready to accept this team's existence. In a nutshell, US leaders were trying so hard to succeed, and IDC leaders were trying so hard to fail this model.
Just to disrupt the balance in the team, the IDC leader says these kinds of statements in a team meeting: "We don't have a budget for these many members."
To my surprise, when I resigned, the IDC leader said that I took the right decision. Anyway, this team is going to be dissolved.
Politics happen almost at all organizations, but here it crossed every limit.
In a nutshell, I would say Walmart sucks.
Don't recruit new engineers until you have plans for them.
First, I had a talk with HR about the interview process. They gave a detailed overview. There are a total of three rounds with the team: * One coding/algorithm round * One on old projects/languages * A final round about system design
It was an onsite interview. First was a coding test, then a problem-solving round, and finally an HR round. The coding assessment was through HackerRank. The experience was good, and HR was helpful and communicative. They released the offer by eveni
Applied through a referral. I had a telephonic screening first, then was called on-site for an interview. The interviewers were intimidating and did not make the experience pleasant. They bombarded me with questions, and the moment they realized an
First, I had a talk with HR about the interview process. They gave a detailed overview. There are a total of three rounds with the team: * One coding/algorithm round * One on old projects/languages * A final round about system design
It was an onsite interview. First was a coding test, then a problem-solving round, and finally an HR round. The coding assessment was through HackerRank. The experience was good, and HR was helpful and communicative. They released the offer by eveni
Applied through a referral. I had a telephonic screening first, then was called on-site for an interview. The interviewers were intimidating and did not make the experience pleasant. They bombarded me with questions, and the moment they realized an