The old-timers who are still around as a result of multiple buyouts actually know what they are doing. They are proper engineers who enjoy their work and get to the bottom of things.
The pay could be worse; it's not as competitive as they think, however.
If you like to be seen more than you like to work, you're going to love it here.
Nobody knows what they are doing.
There is so much churn that all of the new hires are either still wet-behind-the-ears, fresh out of college, or have never worked in the position they are hired into. Much of the existing leadership has made it into those positions not by merit, but by surviving round after round of layoffs/attrition.
These are people who knew very little about their role, but were either:
Real engineers who actually like solving problems? Forget this place. It's all bubblegum holding this place together, on the shoulders of the giants that came before them.
Their infrastructure is crumbling fast. There are constant broadcast and digital failures (just read the comments on their apps, for heaven's sake!)—and no one knows how any of it works. Those of us that do are being ignored, and we are all slowly moving on to greener pastures.
HR runs everything. The head of your department wants to get something done, but HR isn't buying it? Sorry. Doesn't even have to involve a personnel matter, simply a technical one. It's a clown show!
Put engineers who have actually made an impact on their area of expertise in charge of their respective departments. Stop allowing HR to decide how department heads can run their organizations. Stop with the culture programs over actual production programs! "Go woke, go broke" is going to become much more apparent to you in the future.
I had a phone screen that lasted thirty minutes and did not hear back until ten days later. I received a call from HR to set up an in-person interview, which we did. I then met with the hiring manager.
The process was pretty comprehensive. The first consisted of a basic understanding of the position and my skill set, followed by a panel interview with upper-level employees and my understanding of the professional field. The final was a test of sort
College Placement: Round 1 was MCQs with a section where you had to tell about yourself to an AI bot. Round 2: It was a 3-hour interview process where there were two personal interviews. They asked me about myself and then presented two easy to med
I had a phone screen that lasted thirty minutes and did not hear back until ten days later. I received a call from HR to set up an in-person interview, which we did. I then met with the hiring manager.
The process was pretty comprehensive. The first consisted of a basic understanding of the position and my skill set, followed by a panel interview with upper-level employees and my understanding of the professional field. The final was a test of sort
College Placement: Round 1 was MCQs with a section where you had to tell about yourself to an AI bot. Round 2: It was a 3-hour interview process where there were two personal interviews. They asked me about myself and then presented two easy to med