Good pay and bonus for good work. Interesting subject matter and excellent management support, but that is highly dependent on your business area.
It takes a tremendous amount of time to get a small amount of work done. Any change requires multiple levels of approval, usually by people who have no idea technically what the change does or its implications.
Hypocritical messaging regarding changing behavior for fixing ethics issues and customer abuse while still exhibiting dubious legal behavior.
Some senior developers hide information and resist on-boarding efforts of newer developers to make themselves more valuable. Sink or swim mentality. Assume you have the same knowledge as another developer who has been there for 20 years. Constant use of acronyms and system names in the presence of new employees without explanation so as to make comprehension more difficult.
Absurdly cumbersome processes that have no value. For some reason, most seem to think this is acceptable and even engage in enforcing these processes.
It can take weeks or even months to get the development tools and access needed to do your job, but you are still expected to get the job done without those tools.
The list goes on...too long to list here.
Stop jerking customers around and pretending you are trying to do better when your actions prove you are not. Scale back the ridiculous amount of needless red tape if you expect to remain competitive.
Two-step process: first was behavioral, second was technical. The behavioral was easy. The tech was a little different, as there were so many questions. Honestly, I think the people asking didn’t actually understand the technical parts as well, so th
It was a simple and straightforward interview process. There was a phone screening by the vendor, followed by 3 rounds of in-person interviews, all in one day as per my request. The in-person rounds were to the point, and they focused on what they
I cold applied in August, as soon as their applications opened. I got an OA a week or so later on HackerRank. It was basic multiple-choice questions with two coding implementation questions. Then I got an email asking about my location preferences. A
Two-step process: first was behavioral, second was technical. The behavioral was easy. The tech was a little different, as there were so many questions. Honestly, I think the people asking didn’t actually understand the technical parts as well, so th
It was a simple and straightforward interview process. There was a phone screening by the vendor, followed by 3 rounds of in-person interviews, all in one day as per my request. The in-person rounds were to the point, and they focused on what they
I cold applied in August, as soon as their applications opened. I got an OA a week or so later on HackerRank. It was basic multiple-choice questions with two coding implementation questions. Then I got an email asking about my location preferences. A