The interview process with Wish was an overall negative experience. It started with reading existing reviews on Glassdoor, and suspecting it wouldn't be different for me. Unfortunately, I was right.
To make this short and concise, I will say that there were a few red flags along the way:
No itinerary for the onsite interview, so you don't even know who you are meeting. The only thing I knew was I was meeting two people, and lunch was provided. I guessed I would meet a third person if I did really well.
Invited to the wrong floor (40th instead of 38th).
Felt like I wasted people's time. The first interview was reasonable, and I did not do terribly. I might not be a great cultural fit, or overqualified, but professionally, it could not have been really bad.
The second interview was a joke. The person was clearly informed by the QA person that she did not like me, so I was not even given a chance to demonstrate my abilities. He seemed indifferent, impersonal, and bored. It lasted 3-4 minutes. I have never had such an experience throughout my career.
Why make a person take PTO or free time and spend a day getting ready, driving, parking, and going back home?
Could they not do another phone screen? Skype? Especially if it all relies on a single interviewer?
Can you find a bug here? (Shown a simple mobile app bug)
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Wish Test Engineer role in San Francisco, California.
Wish's interview process for their Test Engineer roles in San Francisco, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Wish's Test Engineer interview process in San Francisco, California.