Great technology, talented people, best employer. No impact for performing people.
Always tried to catch up with the market, rather than leading.
Waste of time. 4-hour work sample plus 6 hours of interviews. No discussion of the work sample or feedback on it was provided. The technical interviewers were not friendly or collaborative and spoke poor English.
It is a very intensive interview process. The tech screen is done by the hiring manager and covers mostly experience, projects, why you are looking for a job, and behavioral questions. Then, there is a coding question. The onsite portion consists of
I interviewed with a different department at Yahoo in the past, and this experience was equally frustrating. The interview itself was not particularly difficult; however, communication from the recruiter was spotty. Shortly after the virtual onsite
Waste of time. 4-hour work sample plus 6 hours of interviews. No discussion of the work sample or feedback on it was provided. The technical interviewers were not friendly or collaborative and spoke poor English.
It is a very intensive interview process. The tech screen is done by the hiring manager and covers mostly experience, projects, why you are looking for a job, and behavioral questions. Then, there is a coding question. The onsite portion consists of
I interviewed with a different department at Yahoo in the past, and this experience was equally frustrating. The interview itself was not particularly difficult; however, communication from the recruiter was spotty. Shortly after the virtual onsite