"How can I help with what you guys are doing with Taro?" - 9/13/2022

- If you can afford it, please [join Taro Premium](https://app.jointaro.com/membership)!
  - If you work at a Big Tech company, there's a good chance you have L&D (learning and development) budget that you can use to expense Taro and pretty much get it for free! Here's a [template](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xpY2XBKTpiMN-o7U2c1pvqai5afQSVIuGMgQZiB-_Rg/edit) you can share with your manager to get Taro reimbursed.
  - Here are the companies we know of that can reimburse Taro: Meta, Google, Amazon, Robinhood, Airtable, Yelp, Gusto, Shopify, Gusto, New Relic
- Send us your feedback!
  - As an early user of Taro, you have outsized power for taking a bet on us. We listen very closely to all user feedback at this stage.
  - On the mobile apps, we have a "Send feedback" button in your profile.
  - We're also on LinkedIn and the [Tech Career Growth Slack](https://join.slack.com/t/techcareergrowth/shared_invite/zt-lt2tbjcn-LOAVIDuGPI~nkuc4woHDLg).
- If the Taro's content is helpful for you, share it!
  - In the mobile apps, there's a share button on every Q&A and video.
  - We spent a lot of time on the underlying tech for this sharing, using something called "dynamic links". They work on every platform, matching the user to the Taro web app, iOS app, or Android app accordingly.
  - Fun fact: Taro content links will open up within the Android app after you install it and sign-in if you are shared a piece of Taro content and didn't have the app yet.
- If you're on Taro Premium, please share your perspective and answer questions! One of our core goals is to diversify the perspective on the platform.

The Key Insight Behind Negotiation

Write A Stellar Resume As A Software Engineer [Part 3] - The Key To Writing A Great Resume

In the vast majority of cases, a recruiter is reviewing the resumes of software engineers. This means a lot more than most engineers realize. This lesson teaches you:

- The #1 principle you **need** to remember when writing your resume
- The important attributes of recruiters when it comes to vetting resumes
- How to truly empathize with recruiters and infer their resume screening behaviors based on that
- How recruiters read through engineering resumes

Nail Your Promotion As A Software Engineer [Part 3] - The Key To Understanding Promotion

We're told our entire lives that the key to success is to work hard. While this is admittedly true for most professions, it's very much not the case when it comes to software where you need to work *smart* in order to get anything done, especially for promotion. This lesson teaches you:

- The key insight behind understanding what promotion truly means, especially at top companies
- Why you can't get promoted by just working longer hours and writing more code, especially at very senior levels
- A framework to understand what separates incredibly senior (L6+) engineers from the more junior ones
- What it means to think multiplicatively instead of individually, including an in-depth example

Excited about developing better product intuition after watching this lesson? Check this out: ["How to develop product sense as an engineer?"](https://www.jointaro.com/question/w84sxyM805YOCokfvuQ8/how-to-develop-product-sense-as-an-engineer/)

Level Up Your Code Quality As A Software Engineer [Part 3] - The Myth About Better Code

So many software engineers and engineering managers don't actually understand the relationship between code velocity and code quality. This lesson will teach you:

- Why code quality and code velocity aren't at odds with one another, completely busting the myth that writing better code makes you ship more slowly as a software engineer. In fact, they actually go quite well together!
- The true, nuanced relationship between how good a software engineer's code is and how fast they move
- Where you want to be as a software engineer when it comes to balancing code quality and code velocity
- How the highest-performing software engineers use their stellar code quality as an asset to move faster and land more impact than everyone else

[Masterclass] Should You Work At FAANG? - What Big Tech Is Like For Software Engineers

Working at FAANG isn't all sunshine and roses, which most software engineers don't realize. This masterclass extensively covers both the pros *and* cons of working at Big Tech, with the cons being angles that are rarely talked about online.

### Pros of Big Tech
- Compensation (obviously)
- Boosts your resume 10x, often automatically getting you phone screens
- Higher-quality and more well-rounded learning from being surrounded by talent
- In general, provides a solid foundation for your career across most crucial aspects

### Cons of Big Tech
- It's stressful - Between the sky-high expectations, PIP culture, and much more, most engineers find it difficult just to survive at Big Tech. The vast majority of SWEs at these companies have poor work-life balance
- Politics - There's so many cooks in the kitchen that it can be glacially slow to get anything done
- Growth wall at senior/staff - The senior promotion is notoriously difficult at FAANG, especially at Amazon and Google. You are often competing for scope against your teammates
- Unfulfilling work - Big Tech projects are usually very incremental, and you will own a tiny piece of a tiny piece of a tiny piece, especially if you're L3/L4 (junior/mid-level).

### Is Big Tech right for you?
- It depends! Work backwards from your career goals and use the information from this presentation to make an informed decision
- Big Tech generally pays higher dividends when you're earlier-in-career
- If you're a very experienced engineer who hasn't worked for Big Tech before, it can be dangerous. Work-life balances needs generally scale up with age, and it will be harder for you to adapt to the Big Tech style

Related resources:
- ["What's the difference between Big Tech and startups in terms of learning and growth?"](https://www.jointaro.com/question/KWXIrFIR1EIJsvdOdo7u/whats-the-difference-between-big-tech-and-startups-in-terms-of-learning-and-growth/)
- [How To Get FAANG Interviews](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/pIMdopWoJFfbANnzo7U5/how-to-get-faang-interviews/)
- [[Masterclass] How To Choose A Good Company And Team As A Software Engineer](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/0WEmTNZOMIh8xAdfO3JH/masterclass-how-to-choose-a-good-company-and-team-as-a-software-engineer/)
- [Presentation Slides](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1T5prt4AsEUxS1Yx5BvAIO4OYNFFGD5mCyv8g9UFzrTA/edit?usp=sharing)

Not Getting Stuff Done? Find Someone To Call You Out

Why are accountability partners so helpful when it comes to productivity?

True or false: A good accountability partner is willing to shame you a bit sometimes.

How do good accountability partners help with excuses?

- Finding an accountability partner is one of the most powerful ways you can shore up your productivity.
  - You can understand your own potential when you see what your peers can do
  - They can offer help when you're feeling low or stuck
- Humans inherently don't like letting other people down: We're a social species. Just having someone who's expecting or even counting on you to make decent progress regularly makes you far more motivated to actually get stuff done out of fear of disappointing them.

Related resources:
- ["How do you network effectively within a company?"](https://link.jointaro.com/Hr1nr53D7sfQAEv3A)
- ["How can I better network with other software engineers in the Bay Area?"](https://link.jointaro.com/42JLsbppRMwAJAPUA)

Ask Questions Well

What makes a high-quality question?

- You get the help you need
- You build trust with the person/group that you're asking the question to

Question asking is a deep skill that requires you to add sufficient context (but not too much) so people can easily help you.

- Prefer to ask in public forums
- Realize that your question may help others beyond you
- Your questions are a valuable signal to the team 

When you are asking a question, please don't just say hello and wait for them to respond: <https://nohello.net/en/>

How To Work With Your Manager To Get The Performance Review Rating You Want

Too many engineers are afraid of awkward conversations, so their plan is to just do good work and hope for the best. This rarely works.

Here are the points from the video:
- **Getting the rating you want is a team sport** - You need to be in-sync with others (particularly with your manager) on your desired outcome. You have to be transparent about what you want. Use your 1 on 1 to have those hard conversations with your manager on the delta between where you are now and where you want to be. It's painful to hear that you're falling behind, but it's much better to hear it 3 months before the performance review instead of 3 days before.
- **Don't assume that you're doing well** - Just because you're not receiving negative feedback doesn't mean that you're doing okay; the reality is that you could be doing as bad as trending towards PIP. Remember that managers are busy, and they can easily forget to give you critical feedback in a timely manner (or just not fully realize you're not doing well until they see peer feedback).

Related resources:
- [[Taro Top 10] Software Engineer To Engineering Manager (IC -> M Track)](https://www.jointaro.com/playlist/oz0mnJvHHgM8NfVF7rgp/)
- [[Masterclass] What Software Engineers Should Look For In Their Engineering Manager](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/oeY7ncZhzJ5NO6dij5e7/masterclass-what-software-engineers-should-look-for-in-their-engineering-manager/)

This Is What Most Companies Get WRONG About Promotion

- 2 types of promotion:
  - **Strong companies:** Already functioning at the next level
  - **Weak companies:** Mastery of current level + long tenure
- In the best tech companies, each level is fundamentally different from the previous one. This is why promotion is lagging there: You need to be functioning at the next level consistently for 3-6 months before getting promotion.
- The goal is to avoid the Peter Principle: Getting promoted to higher and higher levels until you are completely incompetent. When levels are truly meaningful, it's really easy to be doing great at your current level and then be struggling to survive at the next one.

What Makes Up Total Compensation (TC) In Tech And Which Parts Matter

Understanding The Differences Between Engineering Levels

True or false: Very senior engineers are at their levels because they act and operate in a fundamentally different way from their more junior peers.

How can you properly tell the more senior engineers from the others?

Which one of these is a core example of what a very senior (i.e. Staff or above) engineer would do?

Nail Your Promotion As A Software Engineer [Part 2] - You Can’t Job Hop To Success

A lot of software engineers give up way too easily when they're faced with substantial career resistance. You can't achieve that much genuine growth when you're constantly hopping around, and this reflects in both your level and compensation. This lesson teaches you:

- Why most engineers hit a wall when solely trying to job switch their way into higher levels, especially at senior and staff
- The defining trait of engineers who make it to incredibly senior engineering levels (Staff+)
- How to become a 10x engineer (i.e. Staff+ at a top company)
- Why it takes so long to truly settle into an organization and be able to demonstrate L6+ impact and behaviors

If you're interested in the 7 levels playlist, here it is: [Asking 7 Levels Of Engineers The Most Important Skill](https://www.jointaro.com/playlist/TnJFvWcvpUvFWLFjpY7X/) (here's the [combined YouTube video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1pg5kI0VI4))

Check out this discussion about the costs of being [perceived of being a "job hopper."](Perception of being a \"job hopper\"?)

Why Onboarding Matters

This video discusses the importance of onboarding and how it can significantly impact your reputation and career growth. 

If you imagine a "**Trust Meter**" where 0 means you have no trust and 100 means absolute trust, your default score as the new engineer will be around 50. Existing employees will think you are smart and have good intentions, but you need to work hard to increase the score and unlock larger-scoped projects. This hard work begins in onboarding.

The other reason the initial months in the company are important is because the tech industry is changing increasingly rapidly. When the average tenure at a company is &lt; 2 years, you need to figure out how to fully ramp up in a fraction of that time. Even within the same company, you will likely switch teams multiple times. Re-orgs are so common!

By approaching onboarding with a proactive plan and a sense of urgency, you can set yourself up for success and build strong relationships quickly.

Level Up Your Code Quality As A Software Engineer [Part 4] - What ACTUALLY Makes Code Good

Code quality is one of the most misunderstood topics in software engineering due to a combination of engineering laziness and misinformation. This video will teach you:

- What ACTUALLY makes code good and high-quality and why we're even software engineers to begin with
- How to have proper empathy for the end-user
- The common mistakes software engineers make when determining how good code is, including a very common misconception about how FAANG works
- The true value of clean code patterns and how they add value to the end-user instead of just being buzzwords (that can potentially make the code worse when used incorrectly)
- The #1 guiding principal when it comes to writing truly high-quality code

The Framework Through Which To Evaluate Engineering Productivity

When you reflect on your day or week, two spectrums through which to evaluate how your time was spent: 

1. How much of your time was spent **reactively vs proactively**?
2. How much of your time was spent **consuming vs creating**? 

The most productive engineers (and the most senior engineers) are very proactive, and they also lean heavily on the creating end of the spectrum. That means you should spend less time passively attending meetings, and more time breaking down projects, writing code, and setting direction for your team.

It’s much harder to create content compared to consuming content. But the majority of impact as an individual or business comes from creation. As a result, the world rewards the people who are able to create high quality video/code/writing over a long period of time.

- [Reactive vs proactive as a manager](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/VCSrWjEBu3WCaSWCn2ak/signs-of-a-bad-engineering-manager-reactive-vs-proactive/)
- [A hack to supercharge your learning when you create - the Lego Model](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/9cVK5zsAQstbTCc1wrWx/how-the-best-software-engineers-learn-the-lego-model/)

Connect with Steve: 
- [Taro](https://www.jointaro.com/profile/aZJL3ucq9dQnscO09F4JDRkgPo72/)
- [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/@ALifeEngineered)

Software Engineers - Don't Forget These 2 Things When Considering A Team

These 2 more tactical aspects are often forgotten by software engineers when evaluating a team, even though they are huge influencers on your work-life balance and career growth on a team:
- **Oncall** - You want to make sure that the team has a healthy system there where you aren't oncall too often, and the system is stable (so you don't need to wake up in the middle of the night constantly to fight fires). For more information on how to evaluate the health of an oncall rotation, check out the linked discussion below from an Atlassian Software Engineer.
- **Code review speed** - It is easy for slow iteration here to stack up. If your team takes 3 days on average to review your PR and you need 3 revisions to finalize your commit, that means it will take you 2 entire weeks to land code (which is abysmal). A good team will turnaround code reviews in <1 day.

This clip was taken from our [masterclass on finding the best company/team for you - Click here to watch the full thing](https://link.jointaro.com/F4DDyKfuo3hMhj868).

Related resources:
- ["How do I factor in oncall into my team selection?"](https://link.jointaro.com/3LHQz46Ft1c7ZoXo6) - Question from a Junior Software Engineer at Atlassian
- [Code Review MUST Be Fast, Otherwise The Team Is Unhealthy](https://link.jointaro.com/oxK55E1bkX8nMeNGA)

What Big Tech Data Structures And Algorithms Interviews Generally Look Like

FAANG interviews are some of the most well-defined in the industry. However, this style of software engineer interview is often completely failed due to a lack of preparation. Here's what to expect when it comes to data structures and algorithms interviews for Big Tech.

Here are the core points from the video:
- **Phone screens are Leetcode easy and medium** - This will either be 2 easy problems or 1 medium problem. This means that if you haven't progressed to onsite rounds yet, don't spend much time on Leetcode hard problems: That's a premature optimization. Make sure you have your easy and medium problem mastery down, so you can even make it to that final round.
- **Onsites are Leetcode medium and hard** - This will either by 2 medium problems or 1 hard problem. If you receive a problem that's more on the medium side, make sure to budget your time well. There's a good chance the interviewer wants you to solve another problem on top of that.

Related resources:
- [[Masterclass] How To Ace Your Big Tech Interview - Data Structures & Algorithms](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/V4sTACzfOh22nMVcUV3w/how-to-ace-your-big-tech-interview-data-structures-and-algorithms-7172021/) - This is the full video this clip is taken from
- [[Masterclass] How To Ace Your Big Tech Interview - System Design](https://www.jointaro.com/lesson/J3I9fTW9ulr6T9KjxpqY/how-to-ace-your-big-tech-interview-system-design-1162021/)

Voicing Your Problems And Frustrations Productively

Which of these are important things to remember as you are voicing your problems and frustrations?

Is the following a good way to voice a problem: I really hate how John thinks about the product. His vision does not make sense, and it will drag down the team. You can tell that he does not have enough experience.

"I really hate how John thinks about the product. His vision does not make sense, and it will drag down the team. You can tell that he does not have enough experience." - What is wrong with how this frustration is presented?

Your Tech Resume Should Look Boring

True or false: As long as you have basic proficiency with everything on a job posting, you will get an interview for that job.

How much time does a recruiter spend reading a resume, on average?

True or false: Your resume should be boring and straightforward, especially with its format.

What's the main reason you should avoid the paid flashy resume formats you find online?

True or false: In order to stand out from other applicants, you can use a very unique format to make your resume more memorable to the recruiter, thus increasing your chances.

Tech Career Growth Videos

Our instructional videos provide software engineers with insights needed for career growth. Masterclasses go incredibly in-depth on a specific tech topic while case studies are real examples from established engineering leaders.