Good work environment: there are people who are always willing to help you.
You learn about the technologies used in your project, but it's complicated to steer in another direction if you wish.
The offices are incredible and the lunch card is the most coveted.
Poor salaries for all levels.
The career counselor's follow-up is not the best.
There is a lot of work addiction and, on the other hand, there is a lot of ill will between teams.
Some leaders do not fulfill their function nor do they know how to delegate because they prefer to do it themselves and are not interested in working until dawn.
Mejorar la calidad de las talent discussion y su contenido.
Three steps: screening, technical, then leadership with a managing director. The HR screening was straightforward. The technical one was average and interesting. Finally, the leadership one was behavioural and business-focused. An offer letter was
Quite mediocre and very rushed, a phone call to a position I applied for about 40 days ago. The recruiter didn't even read the CV or know English. No one will intend to join the company if they are treated like cattle.
They ask you about your experiences and to talk a little about yourself. They present situations and how you would solve them. You have interviews with leaders in English and, in some cases, the client joins.
Three steps: screening, technical, then leadership with a managing director. The HR screening was straightforward. The technical one was average and interesting. Finally, the leadership one was behavioural and business-focused. An offer letter was
Quite mediocre and very rushed, a phone call to a position I applied for about 40 days ago. The recruiter didn't even read the CV or know English. No one will intend to join the company if they are treated like cattle.
They ask you about your experiences and to talk a little about yourself. They present situations and how you would solve them. You have interviews with leaders in English and, in some cases, the client joins.