Unlike many companies that claim "possibilities of career development" but you end up stuck to a chair, Akamai really gives chances to develop your "career path". There is a possibility of changing position and/or team within the company if you're interested in going forward with what you do. Team managers are open to talk about it, and so on. Sure, you must be a good employee to get a chance.
AFAIK, salary in Krakow is quite competitive. The office is generally nice, but be prepared for open spaces. Even though Akamai is an international corporation, employees are not bothered with too many procedures and bureaucracy. However, this strongly depends on the division an employee works in.
There is a nice atmosphere among people, and what's important, good and mostly friendly relationships with managers.
It is still a corporation, not a small company, so there are some procedures and some stiffness. Not everything is a matter of talking to somebody. Some things just cannot be changed. Salary ranges are defined for a position, so be aware of what position you are applying for.
It's hard to park a car around the Krakow office.
First round was great; it was conversational with the hiring manager. The second round had generic HackerRank questions covering Linux, Bash, and Python. The assessments had nothing related to the actual job. There was a 90-minute time limit, webcam
There were a total of 3 rounds of interviews. The first round was a technical interview, the second was a technical test, and the third was the round with the hiring manager. I was rejected in the third round, which went very well. It was overall a
There was a Hiring Manager round at first for screening. Once screened and chosen for further rounds, three meeting links were shared at the same time. This clearly depicted that these three rounds had nothing to do with each other, and cumulative p
First round was great; it was conversational with the hiring manager. The second round had generic HackerRank questions covering Linux, Bash, and Python. The assessments had nothing related to the actual job. There was a 90-minute time limit, webcam
There were a total of 3 rounds of interviews. The first round was a technical interview, the second was a technical test, and the third was the round with the hiring manager. I was rejected in the third round, which went very well. It was overall a
There was a Hiring Manager round at first for screening. Once screened and chosen for further rounds, three meeting links were shared at the same time. This clearly depicted that these three rounds had nothing to do with each other, and cumulative p