People are generally okay. No toxic people.
It is a tech company making technology.
They do not understand that asking employees to lessen their chances of future employment by working only on tech that is not relevant for future jobs is a big ask for quality engineers. Big asks or sacrifices need to be balanced with significant pay. Below-average engineers don't have much to lose, which they have in spades.
A lot of time is spent dealing with other people's poor communication skills. Few people are good at writing. I am having to type at least twice as many messages for the same outcome as at previous companies I have worked at. There are meetings for everything because people are better at speaking than writing, but because nothing is written down, there is no record of what happened.
All the engineers above the senior level that I have worked with would not be capable of being at the same level at any FAANG. They often create work rather than enable others to work better, which is a major requirement of a Staff or Principal engineer.
You get what you've paid for. I don't see a way to make things better because there are too many below-average employees. The average of below-average employees is not a below-average employee base. The lack of skill in the employee base compounds into an employee base that is worse than below average.
The interview process went like this: 1. Some email back and forth with the recruiter. 2. Hiring manager chat. Some behavioral and technical questions. 3. Technical round 1: Live coding, a simple problem around writing a program for parsing log file
1. Brief call with HR to discuss salary range expectations and what the job is looking for. 2. One-hour interview with the direct hiring manager. Once you pass this stage, HR sets up more interviews. 3. Two more one-to-two-hour interviews with the hi
I had 5 technical rounds and 2 management rounds. Technical rounds were mostly on algorithms, data structures, problem-solving, and design. A dynamic programming problem was also asked. The management rounds were mostly around previous job experien
The interview process went like this: 1. Some email back and forth with the recruiter. 2. Hiring manager chat. Some behavioral and technical questions. 3. Technical round 1: Live coding, a simple problem around writing a program for parsing log file
1. Brief call with HR to discuss salary range expectations and what the job is looking for. 2. One-hour interview with the direct hiring manager. Once you pass this stage, HR sets up more interviews. 3. Two more one-to-two-hour interviews with the hi
I had 5 technical rounds and 2 management rounds. Technical rounds were mostly on algorithms, data structures, problem-solving, and design. A dynamic programming problem was also asked. The management rounds were mostly around previous job experien