Everything is very organized. The in-house tech is well-documented. Folks are friendly, and most of the tech is cutting-edge. High lateral mobility.
Not a lot of vertical mobility. It can get repetitive, as you only work on your specialty. Many systems and processes are already made for you.
It’s a very well-oiled machine and works well. The only thing I could recommend is positive reinforcement for devs.
It was pretty straightforward. I came on as a contractor initially, then transitioned after two years. It was more of an on-the-job interview. The move to employee was seamless, with the same job and same leader.
Interviewed for the React Engineer position. The first 20-30 minutes included questions about React and general coding practices, such as: * React hooks * Class vs. functional components * How you approach code reviews The coding portion involved f
This was a pure technical interview. It featured mostly technical questions, with not many "get to know you" questions. It felt very much like a test, with questions fired for about an hour. All questions were Java-related, at least for this positio
It was pretty straightforward. I came on as a contractor initially, then transitioned after two years. It was more of an on-the-job interview. The move to employee was seamless, with the same job and same leader.
Interviewed for the React Engineer position. The first 20-30 minutes included questions about React and general coding practices, such as: * React hooks * Class vs. functional components * How you approach code reviews The coding portion involved f
This was a pure technical interview. It featured mostly technical questions, with not many "get to know you" questions. It felt very much like a test, with questions fired for about an hour. All questions were Java-related, at least for this positio