Amazing brand, well-packaged benefits, and great opportunities for new employees. Extremely competitive environment.
It's an excellent place to grow your career from start if you're competitive and ambitious, but not empathetic.
It's nearly impossible to succeed in the engineering director role if you're hired from an outside firm. Amex has a cut-throat competitive culture, a constant chase for numbers, and a lack of attention to individual colleagues' needs. Many directors are required to lead often-times upwards of 30 people without the ability to re-structure reporting relationships. Consultants are mainly treated as numbers; however, full-time colleagues enjoy significant benefits, such as 6-month child-care leave, while the rest of the team is expected to pull the burden of delivery.
The leadership expects innovation and delivery of exceeding outcomes at every step of the way. Beating your past numbers is not rewarded; it's expected. Personal sacrifices that mid-level leaders make to keep the team spirit up and deliver on these needs often do not matter. Every month, engineering has some kind of competition, and there are numerous favorites on multiple teams persistently winning the game, while no one cares about specific people. It's all about the numbers. Budget decisions drive every major decision. Very few team members have significant tenures unless they're in competitive senior leadership roles.
I was shortlisted from my campus placement drive after a coding round with three questions. * Two strings * One graph (DFA) The interview was conducted in virtual mode using the Webex meeting app.
The interview experience was good. There are two rounds: * SDET technical round * Director technical round The process was smooth. Be open about your notice period. * Explain about the framework * Coding test * Architecture
I attended the interview for one hour. 99 percent of my answers were correct, but I was rejected in the first round itself. It was simply a waste of time. There was no proper feedback, and it seemed like an eyewash.
I was shortlisted from my campus placement drive after a coding round with three questions. * Two strings * One graph (DFA) The interview was conducted in virtual mode using the Webex meeting app.
The interview experience was good. There are two rounds: * SDET technical round * Director technical round The process was smooth. Be open about your notice period. * Explain about the framework * Coding test * Architecture
I attended the interview for one hour. 99 percent of my answers were correct, but I was rejected in the first round itself. It was simply a waste of time. There was no proper feedback, and it seemed like an eyewash.