Base comp, though less than industry standard for the US, works.
The organization is facing significant leadership challenges. Individuals with limited experience—often less than five years in the industry—are being promoted to senior director roles without the necessary skills to lead at scale.
While work-life balance is promoted on paper, the reality for many teams is intense pressure and burnout. The culture leans heavily on weekly performance tracking, with managers being penalized rather than supported.
Unreal expectations exist on what a person can deliver.
There are also concerning practices around workforce management, including reports of employees being let go shortly before equity vesting periods, raising questions about fairness and long-term employee trust.
Overall, the environment lacks stability and strategic leadership, particularly in engineering, which is critical for sustainable growth and employee well-being.
They scrape data from LinkedIn and sell it, which is a shady practice. LinkedIn blacklisted them and shut down their page. They rebranded themselves as an advertising company. LOL!
It’s important for leadership to take accountability for their decisions and ensure that responsibility is not unfairly shifted onto hardworking employees. A reevaluation of engineering leadership may be necessary to foster a healthier and more transparent culture.
1st Round: HR screening (30 minutes). We discussed my past experiences, reasons for seeking a change, and why I’m interested in Apollo. 2nd Round: Coding (1 hour). There were two easy problem statements, not related to algorithms or data structures.
After initial screening, I got a tech interview that checked if I could write a solution to a problem. I wrote a solution that was correct and where all tests passed, but the interviewer decided that they didn't like the complexity (at the same time
TL;DR: Standard interview, got ghosted. Fairly standard interview process, if not a bit disjointed. I had the initial screen on July 23rd, then the first part of the virtual onsite the next week, then the next part (final?) the following week (which
1st Round: HR screening (30 minutes). We discussed my past experiences, reasons for seeking a change, and why I’m interested in Apollo. 2nd Round: Coding (1 hour). There were two easy problem statements, not related to algorithms or data structures.
After initial screening, I got a tech interview that checked if I could write a solution to a problem. I wrote a solution that was correct and where all tests passed, but the interviewer decided that they didn't like the complexity (at the same time
TL;DR: Standard interview, got ghosted. Fairly standard interview process, if not a bit disjointed. I had the initial screen on July 23rd, then the first part of the virtual onsite the next week, then the next part (final?) the following week (which