Great engineering talent attracts some great people that care deeply about what they work on. Brilliant people at both the executive level and down in the trenches.
Apple is extremely penny-wise and pound-foolish, which is not uncommon at many companies. However, they are ridiculously stingy at providing adequate hardware for engineers. It's sad because we make the hardware.
Many people have third-party CRTs and LCDs because they can't get Apple LCD monitors. Many hours are wasted when every engineer should have at least one loaded, top-of-the-line Mac Pro to build and debug as quickly as possible.
Apple also only rewards its very top people for the successes of the last seven years. Even employees who get exceptional reviews receive raises that are barely more than cost-of-living (5% is considered a large raise, and the same goes for bonuses).
Many engineers are hired with no stock options, and few are ever given out after that. Long-time employees made great sacrifices during the lean years, giving up benefits on an almost yearly basis. Now that Apple is successful, none of those benefits have been restored. Lately, there has been a renewed emphasis on adding some new benefits, so perhaps they are finally seeing the light (or the increased attrition of late).
Compensation is average for the industry (they will even tell you this is their goal), which is sad, given they should be trying to attract the best and brightest and allow them to share in the successes they create.
At the same time, senior management (deservedly so!) receives 50-100% bonuses every year and millions of shares in stock. It wouldn't kill them to hand out a few hundred options a year to highly performing individuals.
Start proactively caring about the morale and concerns of your employees. Don't wait for a brain drain first to take action. We love to work for Apple, but feel that we're not sharing in the company's success. If there were another company around that made kick-ass products like Apple and was more employee-centric rather than product-centric, I think you'd see a stampede to the doors.
I received an opportunity from a recruiter. The process involved finishing a coding exercise, a phone interview, and then an onsite interview. The onsite interview lasted about 2.5 hours, with five people rotating in and out to ask questions.
Interviewed through internal referral. Applied through internal referral. Received an email from the recruiter the other day to arrange a phone screen. Was called by an engineer two weeks later. Talked about working experience and projects.
I uploaded my documents to the Apple website but did not hear back from them for several months. Once I did hear back, they set up a phone interview for sometime within the next couple of days. The phone interview was about an hour long, and they as
I received an opportunity from a recruiter. The process involved finishing a coding exercise, a phone interview, and then an onsite interview. The onsite interview lasted about 2.5 hours, with five people rotating in and out to ask questions.
Interviewed through internal referral. Applied through internal referral. Received an email from the recruiter the other day to arrange a phone screen. Was called by an engineer two weeks later. Talked about working experience and projects.
I uploaded my documents to the Apple website but did not hear back from them for several months. Once I did hear back, they set up a phone interview for sometime within the next couple of days. The phone interview was about an hour long, and they as