Efficiency is key, and hard work is great. You get as much as you put in. If you see it as just work, then that is all it will be.
If you're looking for WLB, then yes, it isn't as great. But if you truly prioritize something, then you will make it happen.
The process was quite typical for a tech company: * Recruiter phone screen * Live coding assignment * On-site with various rounds including coding, systems design, domain expertise, and behavioral/culture fit with hiring manager/other leadership In
Initial coding screen with a couple of engineers over Coderpad. The interview prompt was written in the Coderpad IDE. Multiple test cases were provided to verify the solution. Engineers were friendly and open to questions at the end.
1 online tech round. Virtual onsite: 3 tech rounds + 1 hiring manager round. The coding questions are difficult. If you passed, it moved super fast, and you could ask for feedback when being rejected.
The process was quite typical for a tech company: * Recruiter phone screen * Live coding assignment * On-site with various rounds including coding, systems design, domain expertise, and behavioral/culture fit with hiring manager/other leadership In
Initial coding screen with a couple of engineers over Coderpad. The interview prompt was written in the Coderpad IDE. Multiple test cases were provided to verify the solution. Engineers were friendly and open to questions at the end.
1 online tech round. Virtual onsite: 3 tech rounds + 1 hiring manager round. The coding questions are difficult. If you passed, it moved super fast, and you could ask for feedback when being rejected.