Great products and strong growth.
Good to be on a winning team.
Compensation is more than fair if you include stock grants.
The performance review method is bad. They depend on your fellow employees voting on how good an individual is. It becomes a popularity contest. In addition, management doesn't tell you where you rank.
Scrap the performance ranking method currently employed and move to something that is more objective.
Round 1: A coding session to test your skills on shell coding and debugging. The question itself is entry-level; the only problem is the shell environment. Round 2: The interviewer asked some technical questions. The question wasn't hard, but you we
Apply -> Recruiter Email and conversation -> Interview over phone. Fairly standard process, and recruiter was helpful. There are resources online for preparation. Practice algorithms and low-level data structure stuff.
The entire process is just one "find an element in a sorted array" algorithm exercise. All other aspects don't matter (your experience, language knowledge, etc.). They give the same question to a person with no experience and to someone with 20 years
Round 1: A coding session to test your skills on shell coding and debugging. The question itself is entry-level; the only problem is the shell environment. Round 2: The interviewer asked some technical questions. The question wasn't hard, but you we
Apply -> Recruiter Email and conversation -> Interview over phone. Fairly standard process, and recruiter was helpful. There are resources online for preparation. Practice algorithms and low-level data structure stuff.
The entire process is just one "find an element in a sorted array" algorithm exercise. All other aspects don't matter (your experience, language knowledge, etc.). They give the same question to a person with no experience and to someone with 20 years