Very stable employer. Professional colleagues. Good work ethics. Good financial benefits. Good learning program. Room for innovation.
Classic management morphed and mixed with agile teams.
Reactive management, less planning for longer-term vision.
Slow to apply improvements.
Embrace quality standards in process management and trust/empower the software engineers' expertise.
First, a phone interview, then invited for an on-site interview. Typical abstract questions that have nothing to do with the position, and many "technical" questions that are completely irrelevant. Too many philosophical attitudes abound.
It was the first interview with a group leader. He asked basic questions to check understanding of general principles in optics and signal analysis. For example, he asked me to solve a school problem: the formation of an image in a lens. We also talk
There is an initial screening interview to know your profile, followed with a technical interview with the team. The interview process was fairly quick, with both interviews happening in the same week.
First, a phone interview, then invited for an on-site interview. Typical abstract questions that have nothing to do with the position, and many "technical" questions that are completely irrelevant. Too many philosophical attitudes abound.
It was the first interview with a group leader. He asked basic questions to check understanding of general principles in optics and signal analysis. For example, he asked me to solve a school problem: the formation of an image in a lens. We also talk
There is an initial screening interview to know your profile, followed with a technical interview with the team. The interview process was fairly quick, with both interviews happening in the same week.