Maybe the total compensation. Nothing else.
Totally broken set of company values. They are basically in reverse.
There is no teamwork at all. The new performance system killed it completely. Everyone works for themselves and goals are not linked to higher-level goals. Everyone shows themselves successful by manipulating goals or results. Because everyone wants to seem successful, no one speaks up, or everybody hides/doesn't care about others' metrics.
Incredibly subjective performance calibrations. If you're getting along well with your senior peers, you're safe. It's not possible to succeed otherwise.
The company has zero incentive to build and grow people. You'll die trying to find things to improve yourself or a proper scope. Mentoring is discouraged and is only a tool for showing fake impact. An internal mentoring program had a 10 to 7 mentor-to-mentee ratio.
It is impossible to change any process or decision. The company will simply pay you to not do your job and shut up. Everything is managed top-down and your only responsibility is to disagree but commit. There is no career opportunity at all. You won't learn anything here and will even forget what you know.
No one cares about the product or the users. Everything is about internal politics and making sure your project stays alive.
Upper management is fully opaque on why some decisions are taken and is also not accountable. The new performance system was never scrutinized against proper metrics. Actually, nothing is, even though they say everything should be measurable.
Atlassian has become the worst place to work in the last few years from what it was when I first joined.
Everything changes constantly to make some people's goals green without any traceability. The inner software development loop is very, very bad, and all processes are incredibly inefficient. Yet, they are counting PRs and reviews.
Wannabe FAANG company.
Trust in your workforce. Bring back teamwork.
Initial chat with the recruiter, followed by a pairing exercise. The recruiter ghosted me for a while, then set up a pairing exercise. I attended the pairing exercise, but the interviewer wasn't effective in articulating the requirements or engagin
The interview process had 7 steps: * Phone call with recruiter * Two 1-hour coding interviews with a 15-minute break between them * 1-hour System Design interview * 1-hour Craft interview * 45-minute Values interview * 1-hour interview w
I had a somewhat negative experience in the screening round, as I felt the problem statement was unclear regarding the specific API required for the design problem. I had to ask many questions and make assumptions about the requirements myself. The
Initial chat with the recruiter, followed by a pairing exercise. The recruiter ghosted me for a while, then set up a pairing exercise. I attended the pairing exercise, but the interviewer wasn't effective in articulating the requirements or engagin
The interview process had 7 steps: * Phone call with recruiter * Two 1-hour coding interviews with a 15-minute break between them * 1-hour System Design interview * 1-hour Craft interview * 45-minute Values interview * 1-hour interview w
I had a somewhat negative experience in the screening round, as I felt the problem statement was unclear regarding the specific API required for the design problem. I had to ask many questions and make assumptions about the requirements myself. The