Pros: 401K match, company-paid health insurance (now I hear you have a deductible), good work-life balance (almost too good), paid overtime.

Cons: Most of the projects worked on had a 1:1 ratio of managers to engineers. It's very top-heavy. However, before I left, they started pink-slipping all the upper people that weren't adding value to the company. Company specialty is hardware. It does not know how to write "good" software. Most managers will assign whoever they want to "code" regardless of technical background. Budgets come and go. Not a good working environment if you want long-term ownership of a project.

Pros: Health and Life insurance. 100% Tuition assistance for approved programs.

Cons: Internal research and development is poor. Boeing advances its repertoire through acquisition. IRAD expenditures are assigned by political connections, not by merit. Executive leadership would rather leverage profits to boost their own compensation via stock buybacks than to invest in the development of technology and their employees. They encourage layoffs of level 4-6 engineers, then made it extremely difficult for level 1-3 engineers to get promoted for the level 4-6 work that they had to take over. They embrace diversity and inclusion to the point of driving the company into the ground, promoting unqualified people to positions of power.

Pros: Great work-life balance. Private cubicles, although that may be going away soon. Great atmosphere.

Cons: Not a software-focused company. Only certain programs do true software engineering; the rest are mundane test scripting or designless coding. Large, slow-moving company.