Calendly

Software QA Manager Interview Experience

February 1, 2023

Positive ExperienceGot Offer

Process

Calendly's interview process is one that all other companies should aspire to, as it was impressive from start to finish.

Highly communicative about the expectations leading into each interview so I could prepare appropriately, which was especially helpful given how challenging and stressful the current job climate is. They really want you to be set up to succeed, which shows.

Every person I spoke with helped build excitement in the organization and helped me have a better understanding of how they embody their values, as well as what the work environment was like. Be sure to bring good questions!

Stages:

Phone Screen
Hiring Manager Call
Take-Home Exercise (which was very relevant to the position and current opportunities!)
Panel (4 interviews spread throughout a day, 30-45 minutes each with different focuses and team members)
(At Mgr's discretion) Additional Hiring Manager Call / Closing
Reference Check / Background Check / Offer

They are very thoughtful and intentional with their decision-making process and considerate with how they manage their candidates' time.

10/10 Would Recommend!

Questions

Calendly prioritizes organizational fit. Spend time researching the company, its history, and the values they embody. Above all, be yourself!

Was this helpful?

Interview Statistics

The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Calendly Software QA Manager role in United States.

Success Rate

100%

Pass Rate

Calendly's interview process for their Software QA Manager roles in the United States is incredibly easy as the vast majority of engineers get an offer after going through it.

Experience Rating

Positive100%

Neutral0%

Negative0%

Candidates reported having very good feelings for Calendly's Software QA Manager interview process in United States.

Calendly Work Experiences

People First Organization

Data Architect • Current Employee

October 14, 2022

Pros: Ambitious vision and mission. Stellar perks and benefits. Active focus on values and culture.

Cons: The current growth phase requires lots of change, both technical and organizational, all occurring rapidly. This is not really a 'con' per se, more of a challenge depending on the type of working environment one might be looking for.

People First Organization

Data Architect • Current Employee

October 14, 2022

Pros: Ambitious vision and mission. Stellar perks and benefits. Active focus on values and culture.

Cons: The current growth phase requires lots of change, both technical and organizational, all occurring rapidly. This is not really a 'con' per se, more of a challenge depending on the type of working environment one might be looking for.

Great team, but priorities constantly shift

QA Manager • Former Employee

Los Angeles, CA

Pros: The team and the people that are there are some of the best.

Cons: Constant changing of priorities. Leadership never seems to know what they want.

Great team, but priorities constantly shift

QA Manager • Former Employee

Los Angeles, CA

Pros: The team and the people that are there are some of the best.

Cons: Constant changing of priorities. Leadership never seems to know what they want.

Good Team, Troubled Company

Software Engineer • Former Employee

January 13, 2025

Pros: The majority of teammates were good. The paycheck was received on time.

Cons: This company operates in a way that’s hard to define as typical for an organization. As an engineer, you might spend six months or more building a feature that will eventually be released to just 5% of users, only to be left in limbo afterward. There’s also minimal focus on prioritizing or allocating time to address technical debt. Throughout the process, priorities are often shifted, with decisions driven more by the leadership team’s fluctuating preferences than by data or user research. Once a project is completed, leadership tends to express frustration over timelines, without recognizing that the delays were a direct result of their own decisions or lack of clear direction. This would be more manageable if it seemed leadership had the competence to effectively guide the organization. They need to trust the people they hire to do the jobs they were brought on to do. There was a time when this company was a great place to work, but that was over two years ago. While the tech industry as a whole faces challenges, joining Calendly now would be akin to catching a falling knife. The product has managed to stay afloat and even thrive for years despite the leadership, but now the market has caught up with it. If you’re a user, consider switching to one of the many other alternatives. If you’re a prospective engineer, look elsewhere—somewhere that values individual contributors and engineering in general.

Good Team, Troubled Company

Software Engineer • Former Employee

January 13, 2025

Pros: The majority of teammates were good. The paycheck was received on time.

Cons: This company operates in a way that’s hard to define as typical for an organization. As an engineer, you might spend six months or more building a feature that will eventually be released to just 5% of users, only to be left in limbo afterward. There’s also minimal focus on prioritizing or allocating time to address technical debt. Throughout the process, priorities are often shifted, with decisions driven more by the leadership team’s fluctuating preferences than by data or user research. Once a project is completed, leadership tends to express frustration over timelines, without recognizing that the delays were a direct result of their own decisions or lack of clear direction. This would be more manageable if it seemed leadership had the competence to effectively guide the organization. They need to trust the people they hire to do the jobs they were brought on to do. There was a time when this company was a great place to work, but that was over two years ago. While the tech industry as a whole faces challenges, joining Calendly now would be akin to catching a falling knife. The product has managed to stay afloat and even thrive for years despite the leadership, but now the market has caught up with it. If you’re a user, consider switching to one of the many other alternatives. If you’re a prospective engineer, look elsewhere—somewhere that values individual contributors and engineering in general.

People First Organization

Data Architect • Current Employee

October 14, 2022

Pros: Ambitious vision and mission. Stellar perks and benefits. Active focus on values and culture.

Cons: The current growth phase requires lots of change, both technical and organizational, all occurring rapidly. This is not really a 'con' per se, more of a challenge depending on the type of working environment one might be looking for.

5.0
People First Organization
Data Architect • Current Employee
October 14, 2022
Pros: Ambitious vision and mission. Stellar perks and benefits. Active focus on values and culture.
Cons: The current growth phase requires lots of change, both technical and organizational, all occurring rapidly. This is not really a 'con' per se, more of a challenge depending on the type of working environment one might be looking for.

Great team, but priorities constantly shift

QA Manager • Former Employee

Los Angeles, CA

Pros: The team and the people that are there are some of the best.

Cons: Constant changing of priorities. Leadership never seems to know what they want.

4.0
Great team, but priorities constantly shift
QA Manager • Former Employee
Los Angeles, CA
July 20, 2026
Pros: The team and the people that are there are some of the best.
Cons: Constant changing of priorities. Leadership never seems to know what they want.

Good Team, Troubled Company

Software Engineer • Former Employee

January 13, 2025

Pros: The majority of teammates were good. The paycheck was received on time.

Cons: This company operates in a way that’s hard to define as typical for an organization. As an engineer, you might spend six months or more building a feature that will eventually be released to just 5% of users, only to be left in limbo afterward. There’s also minimal focus on prioritizing or allocating time to address technical debt. Throughout the process, priorities are often shifted, with decisions driven more by the leadership team’s fluctuating preferences than by data or user research. Once a project is completed, leadership tends to express frustration over timelines, without recognizing that the delays were a direct result of their own decisions or lack of clear direction. This would be more manageable if it seemed leadership had the competence to effectively guide the organization. They need to trust the people they hire to do the jobs they were brought on to do. There was a time when this company was a great place to work, but that was over two years ago. While the tech industry as a whole faces challenges, joining Calendly now would be akin to catching a falling knife. The product has managed to stay afloat and even thrive for years despite the leadership, but now the market has caught up with it. If you’re a user, consider switching to one of the many other alternatives. If you’re a prospective engineer, look elsewhere—somewhere that values individual contributors and engineering in general.

1.0
Good Team, Troubled Company
Software Engineer • Former Employee
January 13, 2025
Pros: The majority of teammates were good. The paycheck was received on time.
Cons: This company operates in a way that’s hard to define as typical for an organization. As an engineer, you might spend six months or more building a feature that will eventually be released to just 5% of users, only to be left in limbo afterward. There’s also minimal focus on prioritizing or allocating time to address technical debt. Throughout the process, priorities are often shifted, with decisions driven more by the leadership team’s fluctuating preferences than by data or user research. Once a project is completed, leadership tends to express frustration over timelines, without recognizing that the delays were a direct result of their own decisions or lack of clear direction. This would be more manageable if it seemed leadership had the competence to effectively guide the organization. They need to trust the people they hire to do the jobs they were brought on to do. There was a time when this company was a great place to work, but that was over two years ago. While the tech industry as a whole faces challenges, joining Calendly now would be akin to catching a falling knife. The product has managed to stay afloat and even thrive for years despite the leadership, but now the market has caught up with it. If you’re a user, consider switching to one of the many other alternatives. If you’re a prospective engineer, look elsewhere—somewhere that values individual contributors and engineering in general.

Copyright © Taro