Flexible Working
Flexible way of choosing one's career. You have diverse opportunities to switch your work area if you are interested in another one. In addition, there is retraining support at Capgemini, and I find that simply great.
The working hours are also designed very freely, and you can largely design your day yourself (except for meetings).
High value on initiative.
Very good place for working students: You learn a lot, can switch between projects, and work with many people. Working students are given exciting and valuable tasks. As a working student, you also communicate a lot with clients and learn many important skills in addition to technical know-how.
The atmosphere is very friendly, and you always get support if you need it.
A diploma thesis at Capgemini is a rather controversial topic. There are projects that are very suitable for it, but there are also projects that are unfortunately not suitable for bachelor's/master's theses, yet are still offered as such an opportunity. One must be careful, otherwise the work can be severely hampered.
The work atmosphere at Capgemini is, as mentioned, very friendly but at the same time very neutral. For example, in our department, there is hardly any communication outside of work. If it does happen, it often feels very forced, and there's a lack of a certain feeling that colleagues who have been working together daily for a long time actually act as a team.
Perhaps it is my subjective opinion, but personally I miss a certain contact outside of work. However, my experience may differ greatly from that of others.
The interview process was good. They asked me basic OOPs concepts. I attended only one round. First round was a technical video interview. Two interviewers were there, but only one was asking questions. They asked basic questions in my case.
There are a total of 3 rounds. First is a Technical Interview, second is an Online Assessment Test, and third is an HR Interview. I was selected for the Technical round. The Technical interview was conducted through a Microsoft Teams meeting app, a
It was a horrible experience. The interviewer took more than two hours, continuously pitching questions one after the other. He himself didn't know a few things and, when asked for feedback, gave negative feedback.
The interview process was good. They asked me basic OOPs concepts. I attended only one round. First round was a technical video interview. Two interviewers were there, but only one was asking questions. They asked basic questions in my case.
There are a total of 3 rounds. First is a Technical Interview, second is an Online Assessment Test, and third is an HR Interview. I was selected for the Technical round. The Technical interview was conducted through a Microsoft Teams meeting app, a
It was a horrible experience. The interviewer took more than two hours, continuously pitching questions one after the other. He himself didn't know a few things and, when asked for feedback, gave negative feedback.