Lots of events. Business travels (for some people, it's a plus). Good start for people without much experience. Good office. Good atmosphere on the projects (however, it's a lottery). Reimbursement of a monitor and a chair.
Overall lack of expertise on the projects.
Too much clicking on some tests that don't matter and have nothing to do with work.
No raises after a year of work; no bonuses.
Management should be involved, at least a bit.
My interview was designed in four steps: * Conversation about financial expectations. * Technical conversation, discussing your pros and cons. * Task to complete within 24 hours. * Conversation with the manager.
This was a simple call with the capability manager, lasting 30-60 minutes. There were no hard questions. The manager was checking soft skills and asked about solving a few easy tasks. Everything felt nice and easy, even for someone without technical
Standard 3-step process: * Interview with the recruiter * Technical interview * Interview with the manager The technical interview is held by the current architects. They mostly assess not the hardcore technical knowledge, but the ability to
My interview was designed in four steps: * Conversation about financial expectations. * Technical conversation, discussing your pros and cons. * Task to complete within 24 hours. * Conversation with the manager.
This was a simple call with the capability manager, lasting 30-60 minutes. There were no hard questions. The manager was checking soft skills and asked about solving a few easy tasks. Everything felt nice and easy, even for someone without technical
Standard 3-step process: * Interview with the recruiter * Technical interview * Interview with the manager The technical interview is held by the current architects. They mostly assess not the hardcore technical knowledge, but the ability to