Pros: Good WLB and people are helpful.

Cons: A lot of executive departures, restructurings, and top-down management.

Pros: Good work-life balance. Work, but don't have to work hard or late. Good brand. Decently smart coworkers. Lax hybrid policy; many employees don't go into the office regardless of the official policy.

Cons: Low compensation relative to the market. "No negotiation policy" until they negotiate. Feels like a large Fortune 500 corporation due to: * Not fun at all. * Cult-like orientation. It adds little value. Lack of focus on delivering useful products. Instead, many products are over-documented, overthought, and over-engineered, and pre-optimized before they even hit customers (if there are any). Lots of talk, not enough failing fast. Your experience hinges on what team you are on; teams vary widely across the org. Fragmented codebases with fragmented teams. "Maintainership" frequently changes hands. Non-decomposed monolith makes for painful release schedules and local dev processes. There's typically only one blessed way to accomplish a thing. Lack of freedom in execution due to infrastructure limitations. Tons of staff engineers and a dedicated dev experience team, yet the dev experience is awful.

Pros: Good leadership, excellent benefits. Would recommend to anyone.

Cons: None at all. Would recommend to anyone.