Pros: * Grows fast * Some people are friendly * Comp is ok

Cons: Management is a mess. Tons of meetings. Some teams have bad work-life balance. I saw people create pull requests late at night. Lack of diversity. I feel isolated working as the only female on the team. I met one engineer who was unwilling to answer my questions and showed impatient faces during Zoom meetings, which broke my mental health. Messy codebase.

Pros: Good benefits, competitive salary compared to the market, and flexibility.

Cons: Pressure for in-person work, lack of good process documentation, constant changes, constant fear of termination.

Pros: Good work-life balance. Work, but don't have to work hard or late. Good brand. Decently smart coworkers. Lax hybrid policy; many employees don't go into the office regardless of the official policy.

Cons: Low compensation relative to the market. "No negotiation policy" until they negotiate. Feels like a large Fortune 500 corporation due to: * Not fun at all. * Cult-like orientation. It adds little value. Lack of focus on delivering useful products. Instead, many products are over-documented, overthought, and over-engineered, and pre-optimized before they even hit customers (if there are any). Lots of talk, not enough failing fast. Your experience hinges on what team you are on; teams vary widely across the org. Fragmented codebases with fragmented teams. "Maintainership" frequently changes hands. Non-decomposed monolith makes for painful release schedules and local dev processes. There's typically only one blessed way to accomplish a thing. Lack of freedom in execution due to infrastructure limitations. Tons of staff engineers and a dedicated dev experience team, yet the dev experience is awful.