Inflated salaries, excellent benefits, good PTO time.
Endless red tape.
Overly PC.
Bad middle management.
No room for growth.
Extensive layoffs.
Your contribution is not appreciated; rather, you are a number and easily replaced.
Get your crap together. Since I have been there, not once have the employees been made valuable. You are blind to see that your employees make the company and are not easily replaceable. I have seen more excellent people laid off in the last two years than I am sick. Raises are non-existent. Moving positions is almost impossible. Every department is on financial lockdown while the company brings in billions per quarter. This is not what I thought Cisco was about when I was hired. I am on my way out, as this is not a happy work environment.
The interview was good. I had 5 rounds plus a lunch interview. I was asked to write scripts and was asked about concepts from my engineering background. Overall, it was way too much, but the offer was so good that there are no complaints.
The interview took place over the phone on two separate occasions. In both instances, I spoke with my hiring manager. The first round was to get to know me, and the second was more technical. Overall, the interview was mostly to see if I would fit
Four rounds of discussion focused on technical strengths and weaknesses. However, after a week, the panel discovered they had revised the requirements to seek a candidate with a higher number of years of experience. The rejection was therefore based
The interview was good. I had 5 rounds plus a lunch interview. I was asked to write scripts and was asked about concepts from my engineering background. Overall, it was way too much, but the offer was so good that there are no complaints.
The interview took place over the phone on two separate occasions. In both instances, I spoke with my hiring manager. The first round was to get to know me, and the second was more technical. Overall, the interview was mostly to see if I would fit
Four rounds of discussion focused on technical strengths and weaknesses. However, after a week, the panel discovered they had revised the requirements to seek a candidate with a higher number of years of experience. The rejection was therefore based