Great technology and good brand name. A relaxed working environment.
Poor management. Limited pay rises once you are through the door, even for high performers. Lots of "yes" people.
Listen to engineers and recognize your team when they work well.
The interview had average difficulty, with four rounds of technical interviews. It was fully technical, with no behavioral questions asked. The interviewers were friendly and expected candidates to write compiled and working code. Questions focused
Not the most difficult of interviews. The questions were at an average level for coding interviews, focusing on fundamental data structures and algorithms. They expect a reasonable level of code quality in the answers. You can't get by writing subpar
There were 3 technical rounds and 1 HR round. Nowadays, they might take 5-6 technical rounds. Technical questions were on obvious topics, but the level was above average. They asked questions on: * Exception handling * Object class * Overriding * I
The interview had average difficulty, with four rounds of technical interviews. It was fully technical, with no behavioral questions asked. The interviewers were friendly and expected candidates to write compiled and working code. Questions focused
Not the most difficult of interviews. The questions were at an average level for coding interviews, focusing on fundamental data structures and algorithms. They expect a reasonable level of code quality in the answers. You can't get by writing subpar
There were 3 technical rounds and 1 HR round. Nowadays, they might take 5-6 technical rounds. Technical questions were on obvious topics, but the level was above average. They asked questions on: * Exception handling * Object class * Overriding * I