Taro Logo

Company in denial

Software Engineer
Former Employee
Worked at Cisco for 20 years
October 28, 2014
San Jose, California
2.0
Doesn't RecommendNeutral OutlookDoesn't Approve of CEO
Pros

Cisco has a good benefits package, and they have cash in the bank. I think of them as the IBM of the 1990s. No one was ever fired for buying Cisco. You start with 20 days of PTO a year.

Cons

IMHO, routers/switches have become commodity products. Years ago, Cisco had a sufficient technology lead that they could charge a premium. Today, they are marginally better, if that.

Not an easy place to work. Engineers were given responsibility without resources/empowerment. Big company politics were in place. It felt that you were on call 24/7.

Significant development efforts were in India. Yearly focal reviews put you in competition with your peers, resulting in subtle anti-collaboration. There is not a lot of innovation coming from the company. Cisco buys new technology.

Development is process-burdened.

There is little respect for seasoned professionals. The company has been pushing to get young talent and push out experienced engineers. It seems to me that this is a "bean counter" approach with the assumption that all bodies are equal.

Advice to Management

There are too many VPs. Chambers should move on. Too many VPs -- the company is top-heavy.

Was this helpful?

Cisco Interview Experiences