Taro Logo

Ineffective Mid/Upper Management, impacting innovation

Software Engineering Manager
Former Employee
Worked at Cisco for 20 years
May 1, 2017
2.0
Doesn't RecommendNeutral OutlookDoesn't Approve of CEO
Pros

Generally good engineers.

Depending on what group you are in, can be a fun place to work.

Chance of exposure to different technologies as the company does encourage mobility.

Compensation is fair: base salary plus annual bonus (which is based on company and individual performance). Company also gives out RSUs.

Cons

Upper management is often out of touch with the underlying problems, leading to either inaction or, worse, ill-informed decisions.

Company struggles to innovate due to very heavy processes that stifle putting ideas into action. Cisco, with their big wallets, can overcome this via acquisitions.

Acquisitions typically struggle to innovate and grow their products. Instead, they become a sustaining shop. Over time, their products either get eliminated or outsourced, and the original group gets laid off.

Annual layoffs nurture a sub-optimal culture. It does not matter if you are really good or not; if you happened to be on the wrong project, you can be impacted.

Annual peer ranking feeds into the annual layoffs. Everyone is aware of this process, which encourages less-than-ideal behavior.

Raises are slim or too infrequent.

Advice to Management

Get rid of peer rankings.

Was this helpful?

Cisco Interview Experiences