Interesting group of people, working on good technology.
Good sense of long-term vision by the execs.
General culture of being willing to take risks on new technology.
Bureaucracy for anyone trying to hire people, buy capital equipment, or add a vendor to the approved vendors list is horrible.
Inter-team petty politics, particularly by some Support managers, is a pain.
Strategy seems to change too frequently to be able to implement effectively.
Too many people in different customer advocacy roles just trying to justify their own jobs.
They've promised for over a year to:
Stop promising and start delivering, ensuring REAL changes are made. Streamline hiring, streamline procurement, make compensation competitive, and provide realistic possibilities for raises and promotions.
The interviewer was not sincere and was playing with his dog the whole time. I couldn't understand how this person had become director. The questions seemed aimed at proving what you don't know rather than what you do know.
6-7 rounds of interviews were conducted by each of the stakeholders, such as the team leads, Senior Manager, Product Manager, Project Manager, and Director. Most interview questions focused on ensuring the right fit in terms of understanding their s
There were three rounds of technical and behavioral questions. The interviews were conducted professionally, lasting 40 minutes with 5 minutes of Q&A. Technical questions focused on the current project, followed by several behavioral questions.
The interviewer was not sincere and was playing with his dog the whole time. I couldn't understand how this person had become director. The questions seemed aimed at proving what you don't know rather than what you do know.
6-7 rounds of interviews were conducted by each of the stakeholders, such as the team leads, Senior Manager, Product Manager, Project Manager, and Director. Most interview questions focused on ensuring the right fit in terms of understanding their s
There were three rounds of technical and behavioral questions. The interviews were conducted professionally, lasting 40 minutes with 5 minutes of Q&A. Technical questions focused on the current project, followed by several behavioral questions.