Smart colleagues. Best technology used where it matters. Result orientation. Above-market company performance. Diversity of projects. Upward mobility. Incredible learning opportunities. Superlative compensation and incentives.
Workload can be high.
Work-life balance can be challenging.
The social environment at work might be drier than academia or more relaxed employers, as most people are highly focused on doing their jobs best, rather than engaging in conversation or bonding.
None at this time.
The interviewer was good. He took time to establish the ground. Initial questions were more behavioral in nature, followed by a couple of technical questions. There were about four interview rounds: one technical (lasting for about an hour) and other
It was a cordial experience, and they splash money around. They are okay bringing anybody in from around the world. If they quit after six months, they apparently believe that is okay and the trade was good; if you quit after six months, then they do
Terribly difficult OA. 4 questions in 120 minutes. I was reading on Reddit, and the average solved is one question, and that's it. I have no idea who is expected to solve all of this, but who knows.
The interviewer was good. He took time to establish the ground. Initial questions were more behavioral in nature, followed by a couple of technical questions. There were about four interview rounds: one technical (lasting for about an hour) and other
It was a cordial experience, and they splash money around. They are okay bringing anybody in from around the world. If they quit after six months, they apparently believe that is okay and the trade was good; if you quit after six months, then they do
Terribly difficult OA. 4 questions in 120 minutes. I was reading on Reddit, and the average solved is one question, and that's it. I have no idea who is expected to solve all of this, but who knows.