I'm a month into my time at Clay and I've been very happy.
The vibes are good.
Diverse team of smart, pleasant, and creative people, and there's a sincere sense of community here.
Clay treats employees well in a lot of small ways that add up, including competitive pay.
So far so good.
Typical startup-y things. Teams don't know what each other are working on, and Product hasn't figured out how to bridge the gaps. Our external engineering brand hasn't caught up with the cool work that we're doing. Major decisions get blocked on leadership.
In my short time here, I've noticed that a couple of major decisions in different parts of the org have been blocked on leadership. The solution is probably to delegate better and empower lower-level folks to own larger decisions. Also, we need to invest in our engineering brand. I ran into a top-1% engineer yesterday and told him that I was at Clay, and he said, "What's that?"
The interview process included: * One recruiter screen. * Two back-to-back coding interviews. * One system design and project deep dive interview. The overall process took about 6 weeks. Everyone was very kind. The recruiting team provided so
Everyone I interacted with was smart, compassionate, and excited about their work. The interview felt collaborative, even though it was clearly a technical assessment. For me, the tipping point was going into the office and experiencing the culture
Clay is an immature engineering organization that is grappling with its identity. Unfortunately, this shows in the interview process. My perspective is that Clay is trying its best to maintain a very flat organizational structure that allows the CEO
The interview process included: * One recruiter screen. * Two back-to-back coding interviews. * One system design and project deep dive interview. The overall process took about 6 weeks. Everyone was very kind. The recruiting team provided so
Everyone I interacted with was smart, compassionate, and excited about their work. The interview felt collaborative, even though it was clearly a technical assessment. For me, the tipping point was going into the office and experiencing the culture
Clay is an immature engineering organization that is grappling with its identity. Unfortunately, this shows in the interview process. My perspective is that Clay is trying its best to maintain a very flat organizational structure that allows the CEO