Pros: 1. Founder-led with a long-term vision – Leadership prioritizes sustainable growth over short-term gains. 2. Industry-leading products – We dogfood everything internally, ensuring high quality and first-hand user experience. 3. Talented and collaborative colleagues – You’ll work with smart, driven people who are eager to solve complex problems together.

Cons: 1. Limited opportunities for remote employees – Remote employees have fewer career growth and internal mobility options compared to in-office counterparts. Strict location requirements severely limit my ability to pursue new roles within Datadog, as very few teams are open to remote hires anymore. 2. Lack of career growth opportunities – My responsibilities and impact have grown significantly, but this has not been reflected in my compensation. For example, despite leading a large team of engineers, my pay remains the same as an individual contributor. There is a disconnect between increased scope and recognition. 3. Lack of transparency – Leadership often makes decisions in isolation and communicates them only after the fact. Instead of fostering strong, autonomous teams capable of making informed decisions, there is a tendency to micromanage. Leadership should focus on enabling teams with the context and trust they need to drive decisions effectively. (This may be specific to my department, rather than the company as a whole.)

Pros: - Great people - Great technical challenges - Great office (Paris, NY...) - Great benefits and compensation

Cons: - On-call duty can wake you up at night from time to time.

Pros: Good pay, nice benefits, a nice, beautiful office, interesting problems to work on, and a successful company. If you manage to keep your head down, you can probably coast pretty easily here.

Cons: Code quality is quite low. Many, if not most, systems at Datadog were built by one-man "teams" of engineers, often as hack-day side-projects, rapidly launched to production well before they were ready. Applications are almost never built in a "normal" way, and there are whole applications without a single test. As a consequence, systems break frequently, and no one even knows how they're supposed to work. As a competent developer, you'll probably notice this in your first two weeks, but you'll also soon discover that there are many sacred cows at Datadog. Despite their obvious deficiencies, the design of these systems is largely non-negotiable. Most of your work will consist of a constant barrage of surprisingly crude DevOps changes just to keep the thing running. For many teams, most work is unplanned and very stressful because it's done in response to outages (we have 3 or 4 outages every day, so half your day will be spent working on "urgent" problems). Backend engineers also participate in the on-call rotation, which ends up being once every 4-6 weeks and lasts for a week at a time. You will be responsible for 90% of the systems, even though you know nothing about them. Because everything is mostly broken, you will be paged every hour. Also, you will get to experience the joys of working with an international team, where because almost every change at Datadog results in an outage, the developers in France will consistently wake you up at 4 AM every morning. The company has grown rapidly, but management has not kept pace. Team leads have no experience in leadership, do no planning, and make irrational, heavy-handed decisions. Concerns are not taken seriously, and you'll be treated like a junior engineer regardless of your prior experience.