Pros: The people here really try to live the values the company espouses. As a manager, I can see the effort my peers in "middle management" make to be coaches and really address life balance, growth, and diversity. When there is conflict, it is healthy in that people have their hearts in what they think is best, versus a political agenda (at least in Engineering). Life balance is great. Folks have a focused 8-hour day and leave at reasonable times. The realities of commuting and the cost of living in the Bay Area are realities we don't take for granted. Working from home 1 to 2 days a week is not an exception; it's a norm. If you are working late on a regular basis, then something has failed; it is not heroic. We are in a high-growth phase, so with growth, there is opportunity in many facets (compensation, career, learning). I feel my most comfortable self here, which may be an artifact of my time in my career as well. But for the most part, I don't feel like I have to fit a certain persona to be accepted, as compared to previous companies.

Cons: With growth can come some growing pains. We need to get better at not just doing things the way they were done before. For a relatively small company, we have some slow, legacy internal processes. Our Jira setup could be a lot more efficient.

Pros: Interesting and challenging work in some areas. Generally good camaraderie among people.

Cons: Leadership is always focused on near-term goals that change very often. Stuck on e-signature, which is not a growing business. Severely underfunded teams, even on critical business priorities. Tons of tech debt, which do not get prioritized.

Pros: Work-life balance was good on my team. My direct manager was great. Exploring new solutions was encouraged and supported.

Cons: Some teams have outside work hours. Upper management doesn't really know what they're doing. Promotions are extremely difficult.