Applied through a referral.
A recruiter reached out to me and set up a phone screen, which I chose to do onsite.
This consisted of 2 interviews, 1 hour each. One involved fetching some data from a server and creating some DOM based on a spec; the other involved creating a pixel-perfect UI based on a spec.
I came back for a full onsite a few days later. Met with lots of people in a 1:1 setting. Treated to lunch, several behavioral/culture-fit interviews, and a couple more technicals very similar to the first round. Most of the interviewers were pretty nice (one was quite weird), and I enjoyed the experience.
Cons: I wish the interview panel was more diverse. The majority was young white males. Also, I did get the impression that the company is experiencing growing pains, as others have noted on here.
I didn't hear back for a few days. I followed up with the recruiter, who let me know they weren't moving forward. She couldn't give feedback. Minor bummer, but it worked out in the end.
Recreate a UI using HTML/CSS as exactly as possible, given a spec.
The following metrics were computed from 6 interview experiences for the Dropbox Web Developer role in San Francisco, California.
Dropbox's interview process for their Web Developer roles in San Francisco, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having negative feelings for Dropbox's Web Developer interview process in San Francisco, California.