Dropbox is a truly special place. I joined the company about five years ago and was blown away by the incredible engineering talent and all-inclusive, transparent culture. Engineers are empowered to propose and work on high-impact projects. Engineering decisions are data-driven, optimizing for the best business outcome. Dropbox invests in growing talent through various high-quality training programs and incentivizes and requires the management team to develop growth plans for each direct report. What's great to see is that Dropbox is still growing and continues to mature. Every company has to balance top-down and bottom-up decision-making. When I joined the company, the top-down element was in its infancy, sometimes resulting in unfocused execution. We have gotten much closer to figuring out how to set top-down direction that both focuses the company on current business objectives and, at the same time, enables teams to deploy their creativity to figure out how to achieve the set goals best. Last but not least, Dropbox's mission is to transform how we work by eliminating the work about work and enabling everyone to focus on genuinely creative aspects of their craft. A mission that all of us can relate to and perhaps be a part of.
The main con can also be a pro for some. Dropbox is currently focusing on identifying the next business opportunity that will perform as well or better than our current core business.
We've made some good progress if you've been following recent launches, but the work is not done. A perfect opportunity to join the company and help get it done for the right kind of folks who enjoy a good challenge and a chance to grow.
It's been amazing to see an engaged Drew operating at all levels. A great founder, still passionate about their business, is vital to continuous success.
Initial phone call with hiring manager. Met with engineering leaders in the Seattle office to talk about the company. Later flew to San Francisco to meet with about 6 people.
Very pleasant interview experience. The process was pretty typical: * A conversation with a recruiter. * A technical phone screen. * An on-site interview, which was split over two days. This was nice in a way, but it also drew the process out.
The interview process begins with an HR interview, followed by two technical rounds. The first technical round focuses on writing code, and the second is for code review. Both rounds are 1 hour long.
Initial phone call with hiring manager. Met with engineering leaders in the Seattle office to talk about the company. Later flew to San Francisco to meet with about 6 people.
Very pleasant interview experience. The process was pretty typical: * A conversation with a recruiter. * A technical phone screen. * An on-site interview, which was split over two days. This was nice in a way, but it also drew the process out.
The interview process begins with an HR interview, followed by two technical rounds. The first technical round focuses on writing code, and the second is for code review. Both rounds are 1 hour long.