Interview load (spending time interviewing new hire candidates) is a bit much (more than at Google).
On-call rotations are relatively noisy, frequent, and don't come with extra compensation (and are an exception to the "pro" of no pressure to work outside of normal hours! But it's usually like 5-10 five-minute interruptions, not a lot of extra time, just annoying).
Internal documentation could be better (you have to rely on asking friendly, helpful co-workers more than you ought!)
My opinion is that the "deep dive" interview is the most time-consuming of the interview types and provides by far the least valuable signal. Just ditching it would make sense to me (maybe keeping it for managerial candidates).
Started with a technical assessment via CodeSignal, which was kind of uncomfortable. Monitoring by camera, microphone, screen share, ID upload, selfie, etc. A lot of work to keep someone in a high-pressure environment, but I think the standards are "
First was a Codility proctored exercise for 90 minutes. There were around 4 levels. The problem was that if you got stuck in level 2, you could not get to levels 3 and 4. The tool was not the best. I did not proceed further after a 600/1000 score.
Very pleasant interview experience. The process was pretty typical: * A conversation with a recruiter. * A technical phone screen. * An on-site interview, which was split over two days. This was nice in a way, but it also drew the process out.
Started with a technical assessment via CodeSignal, which was kind of uncomfortable. Monitoring by camera, microphone, screen share, ID upload, selfie, etc. A lot of work to keep someone in a high-pressure environment, but I think the standards are "
First was a Codility proctored exercise for 90 minutes. There were around 4 levels. The problem was that if you got stuck in level 2, you could not get to levels 3 and 4. The tool was not the best. I did not proceed further after a 600/1000 score.
Very pleasant interview experience. The process was pretty typical: * A conversation with a recruiter. * A technical phone screen. * An on-site interview, which was split over two days. This was nice in a way, but it also drew the process out.