Better than 99% of companies
Better than 99% of companies
- Great culture
- Lots of opportunities
- Vibrant and dynamic
- Very healthy work-life balance
- Not the best compensation on the market.
- Things can be both extremely slow and extremely fast, depending where you are in the company.
Focus on retaining R&D employees, as they are easy to lose when they don't feel appreciated.
It is very costly to onboard new ones. Dynatrace is a very big product; it takes at least a year to get to know the corners of it.
The compensation being stuck at one figure for years, unless you jump out of your skin, is a disastrous factor for retention.
Additional Ratings
Was this helpful?
Dynatrace Interview Experiences
Senior Frontend Engineer
1. Recruiter screening. 2. Behavior interview with Hiring Manager, including general questions about my experience. 3. 2-hour technical interview covering general computer science and React questions, with a small algorithm task involving traversin
Software Engineer
Standard 3-stage interview process. Coding assessment done via an online judge. Time: around 30 minutes for one task that is not common but, at the same time, is not hard.
Software Engineer
It was a rather dynamic interview, featuring a couple of Java exercises and general questions on Object-Oriented Programming. It was enjoyable and reasonable. The second exercise was more difficult, but the interviewers participated in the solution
Senior Frontend Engineer
Gdańsk, PolandJuly 1, 20251. Recruiter screening. 2. Behavior interview with Hiring Manager, including general questions about my experience. 3. 2-hour technical interview covering general computer science and React questions, with a small algorithm task involving traversin
Software Engineer
Gdańsk, PolandOctober 28, 2024Standard 3-stage interview process. Coding assessment done via an online judge. Time: around 30 minutes for one task that is not common but, at the same time, is not hard.
Software Engineer
Gdańsk, PolandJuly 5, 2023It was a rather dynamic interview, featuring a couple of Java exercises and general questions on Object-Oriented Programming. It was enjoyable and reasonable. The second exercise was more difficult, but the interviewers participated in the solution
