Software Engineer (Internship) Interview Experience
December 2, 2020
Positive ExperienceGot Offer
Process
After the coding screen, I had a recruiter call.
Then, I had a final interview round that consisted of three one-hour interviews: two technical and one behavioral. All the interviewers were very friendly and helpful.
Each technical round included one coding question (easy/medium difficulty), and we chatted about coding languages and my interests in CS.
Questions
You are given a list of numbers and a target number, n. List all pairs of numbers in the set that add up to the target number.
Was this helpful?
Interview Statistics
The following metrics were computed from 33 interview experiences for the Expedia Group Software Engineer (Internship) role in United States.
Success Rate
27%
Pass Rate
Expedia Group's interview process for their Software Engineer (Internship) roles in the United States is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Experience Rating
Positive73%
Neutral18%
Negative9%
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Expedia Group's Software Engineer (Internship) interview process in United States.
Expedia Group Work Experiences
4.0
Better Balance, Still Improving
Software Development Engineer • Current Employee
September 18, 2020
Pros: Better Work-Life Balance Compared to Other Companies
Cons: Things are improving compared to last year.
5.0
Healthy culture, undertaking profound change
Director, Engineering • Current Employee
Seattle, Washington, United States
November 19, 2022
Pros: Inclusion & diversity,
healthy culture,
respect for each other's opinions and ideas,
global footprint, scale, and impact,
tech-driven company,
new leadership providing strong vision & direction.
Cons: Slow to change from a siloed culture to a platform organization (vertical to horizontal). Still too much need for consensus, which hinders fast action and decision-making.
4.0
Move over merits, politics are here
Senior Software Engineer • Former Employee
Bellevue, Washington, United States
August 13, 2017
Pros: - Modern work culture with emphasis on diversity and social responsibility.
- In the 80th to 90th percentile overall for innovation, methodology, and tech.
- Very good benefits overall; you are actually expected to use your PTO.
- Very stable financially and gaining share.
- Excellent CEO, creme de la creme IMHO.
Cons: - Programs come and go like the wind, i.e., very inconsistent.
- Lethargic mid to long-term discipline and vision.
- Mentorship programs do not exist.
- Poor workspace planning and slow to react; very, very crowded.
- Fat middle management layer riddled with outdated skills and indecision.
- Advancement relies on political posturing and games rather than merit and vision.
- Very poor equity programs/distribution for anyone not in senior management.
- Below-average retirement plan options.
- 4.0Better Balance, Still ImprovingSoftware Development Engineer • Current EmployeeSeptember 18, 2020Pros: Better Work-Life Balance Compared to Other CompaniesCons: Things are improving compared to last year.
- 5.0Healthy culture, undertaking profound changeDirector, Engineering • Current EmployeeSeattle, Washington, United StatesNovember 19, 2022Pros: Inclusion & diversity, healthy culture, respect for each other's opinions and ideas, global footprint, scale, and impact, tech-driven company, new leadership providing strong vision & direction.Cons: Slow to change from a siloed culture to a platform organization (vertical to horizontal). Still too much need for consensus, which hinders fast action and decision-making.
- 4.0Move over merits, politics are hereSenior Software Engineer • Former EmployeeBellevue, Washington, United StatesAugust 13, 2017Pros: - Modern work culture with emphasis on diversity and social responsibility. - In the 80th to 90th percentile overall for innovation, methodology, and tech. - Very good benefits overall; you are actually expected to use your PTO. - Very stable financially and gaining share. - Excellent CEO, creme de la creme IMHO.Cons: - Programs come and go like the wind, i.e., very inconsistent. - Lethargic mid to long-term discipline and vision. - Mentorship programs do not exist. - Poor workspace planning and slow to react; very, very crowded. - Fat middle management layer riddled with outdated skills and indecision. - Advancement relies on political posturing and games rather than merit and vision. - Very poor equity programs/distribution for anyone not in senior management. - Below-average retirement plan options.
Expedia Group Interview Questions
Explore Interview QuestionsTaro 75Google Interview QuestionsMeta Interview QuestionsAmazon Interview QuestionsApple Interview QuestionsNetflix Interview Questions
Explore Interview ExperiencesOpenAI Interview ExperiencesAnthropic Interview ExperiencesPerplexity Interview ExperiencesWindsurf Interview ExperiencesMistral AI Interview Experiences
