Awesome industry, great work/life balance, and pay
Awesome industry, great work/life balance, and pay
Work/life balance and pay are good for the industry. The vibe does vary from team to team.
As with any big company, there are lots of inefficiencies. It's very hard to find information on lots of topics, and documentation is not highly valued. Therefore, lots of efforts are duplicated.
Additional Ratings
Was this helpful?
Expedia Group Interview Questions
Expedia Group Interview Experiences
Software Development Engineer
I was invited to complete a HackerRank challenge for a new grad position. After that, I was invited for an on-site group interview day. I completed three rounds of interviews, which I thought were very easy. Weeks later, I was told that my technic
Software Development Engineer
The interview process was fairly fast, but a bit heavy. There were 4 technical interviews and 1 HR interview. It turned out to be not too difficult, as some questions were duplicated across all the interviews.
Software Development Engineer
Four rounds: three technical, one behavioral. One technical round tested skills, and the interviewer was vague. She asked about unusual test cases without considering use cases. She was unwilling to listen and unreasonable. The other two interviewe
Software Development Engineer
Bellevue, Washington, United StatesNovember 1, 2016I was invited to complete a HackerRank challenge for a new grad position. After that, I was invited for an on-site group interview day. I completed three rounds of interviews, which I thought were very easy. Weeks later, I was told that my technic
Software Development Engineer
CanadaJune 4, 2014The interview process was fairly fast, but a bit heavy. There were 4 technical interviews and 1 HR interview. It turned out to be not too difficult, as some questions were duplicated across all the interviews.
Software Development Engineer
Seattle, Washington, United StatesMarch 20, 2018Four rounds: three technical, one behavioral. One technical round tested skills, and the interviewer was vague. She asked about unusual test cases without considering use cases. She was unwilling to listen and unreasonable. The other two interviewe
