Pros: - Great work-life balance. There's plenty of work to do, but I've never felt the urgency of releasing anything because deadlines are understood across all parties and are reasonable. - Plenty of growth opportunities by taking leadership opportunities, learning how to solve problems that you haven't faced before, or learning more about freight-forwarding. - A lot of autonomy. There are many places in our product/platform that don't have concrete ownership, so there are opportunities to drive high-impact efforts if you are motivated to do so. - Many interesting technical problems all over the stack in the foreseeable future, both in the infrastructure of the platform and on the features we build. - I enjoy spending time with my co-workers. - Leadership is very mindful in regards to the pace of growth of the company, ensuring we don't outgrow ourselves, preventing quality of service loss, and protecting our work-life balance.

Cons: All the downsides I've seen come from growing pains of a company that has seen continuous, tremendous people/financial growth. * Tech hasn't grown as quickly as product, so we're kind of lagging there. We haven't fine-tuned our environment to be as efficient as possible. There are a lot of efforts in improving dev productivity and stability of our product, but there's a whole lot more that needs to be done in that regard. * Young mid-level leadership. Though we have a more seasoned C-level leadership team, mid-management experience might soon be overshadowed by the size of the team. Technical leadership faced a similar problem and seems to now be taking more corrective action. As a result, we leaned on quantity over quality of tech work, but we should definitely think about doubling down on the foundations that we're building this product on at this stage of growth.

Pros: Good experience, career opportunities, lots of learning.

Cons: Start-up environment, low pay.

Pros: Ideas for change and improvement often come from individual contributors as opposed to management. Switching teams is relatively easy. C-levels are very approachable. The hiring bar is really high, and other engineers come from successful backgrounds. We just hired a VP of Engineering that's going to change/fix a lot of the organizational issues and restructure the org.

Cons: Career advancement and review cycles are still being fully ironed out. The product has a ton of area as it's really wide, and it gets progressively harder to understand everything.