Ability to influence immediate vicinity (some autonomy); interesting projects to work on.
Too much political maneuvering at the senior leadership level; a lack of vision at the executive level; not enough cohesiveness across leadership.
Two phone screens: * One with HR. * One with the hiring manager. Onsite interview with the Lead Engineer and VP. The interview included the usual questions, a technical scenario, and a behavioral question with the VP. I must note that during all
I spoke to HR on the phone, and they promised to get back to me, but never did. Almost five months later, I received an email regarding the decision, by which time I had already been working at a different and better company for a few months. This
I got the interview through the college career fair. Two engineers interviewed me. The first 20 minutes were resume questions. Then there were two algorithm questions.
Two phone screens: * One with HR. * One with the hiring manager. Onsite interview with the Lead Engineer and VP. The interview included the usual questions, a technical scenario, and a behavioral question with the VP. I must note that during all
I spoke to HR on the phone, and they promised to get back to me, but never did. Almost five months later, I received an email regarding the decision, by which time I had already been working at a different and better company for a few months. This
I got the interview through the college career fair. Two engineers interviewed me. The first 20 minutes were resume questions. Then there were two algorithm questions.