Good work/life balance. Satisfyingly challenging work. Collaborative, casual culture. Great access to professional development resources.
Extreme hostility to WFH from upper management. “We’re not looking at data, we just want everyone in office.” Increasingly intrusive methods of monitoring in-office compliance. Still somewhat flexible (2-3 days a week in office required), but a major hit to morale and sense of autonomy. Morale has tanked in general over the past year.
Allow unlimited WFH unless a particular role requires it or a particular employee has proven they can't handle it.
Articulate goals and large-scale vision clearly with concrete metrics.
Three steps: * Behavioral screen with the recruiter. * Followed by a technical screen with an engineer. * Followed by a virtual onsite with LeetCode-style questions, in addition to system design and behavioral interview rounds.
Among the bad experiences I had: * An interview that started without clear requirements, leading to a perfect solution for the problem, but with incompatible results.
The interview process involved four steps: * HR * Home task * Live coding * Interview with hiring manager All interviews were scheduled. I did not pass the coding assessment, but I still had the interview with the manager.
Three steps: * Behavioral screen with the recruiter. * Followed by a technical screen with an engineer. * Followed by a virtual onsite with LeetCode-style questions, in addition to system design and behavioral interview rounds.
Among the bad experiences I had: * An interview that started without clear requirements, leading to a perfect solution for the problem, but with incompatible results.
The interview process involved four steps: * HR * Home task * Live coding * Interview with hiring manager All interviews were scheduled. I did not pass the coding assessment, but I still had the interview with the manager.