Friendly co-workers, fair and approachable management, a culture of learning and mutual support, interesting products, excellent staff canteen (software dev office in Cambridge, UK).
Not a day-to-day problem, but there were occasional bursts of bureaucracy, especially when dealing with US HQ.
Not everything has to be standardized.
The interview process went pretty well. It was mostly technical and aptitude-based, followed by discussions on cultural fit, diversity, family, salary expectations, and negotiations with the manager and the human resources representative.
Three-stage interview process, including an initial screening asking questions to gauge if you have enough relevant knowledge, an in-depth technical interview (no live coding), and finally a management interview.
Gave two rounds, waiting to hear for the next round. The first was managerial, and the second was a HackerRank that contained two coding questions and four MCQs. The two coding questions were medium to easy.
The interview process went pretty well. It was mostly technical and aptitude-based, followed by discussions on cultural fit, diversity, family, salary expectations, and negotiations with the manager and the human resources representative.
Three-stage interview process, including an initial screening asking questions to gauge if you have enough relevant knowledge, an in-depth technical interview (no live coding), and finally a management interview.
Gave two rounds, waiting to hear for the next round. The first was managerial, and the second was a HackerRank that contained two coding questions and four MCQs. The two coding questions were medium to easy.