Good, flexible timings, no excessive work pressure. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Why not? It was so much fun.
Why should I fill this if there is none?
No point in improving something that's already good.
Interview was okay. The first round was aptitude, which comprised of quant, analytical, and technical questions. The second round was a technical round, which had a few good questions. The third round was HR, which consisted of general questions.
I was placed during campus. The process is similar to other IT companies. They check your approach and solution-driven implementations. Quantitative Aptitude was a bit easy. GD was slightly tough. HR was simple and interesting.
I had applied to HSBC Software Development through the Employee Referral Program. One technical interview was taken by the Department Head. It was followed by an HR interview. The process was well organized and very systematic. I would say the int
Interview was okay. The first round was aptitude, which comprised of quant, analytical, and technical questions. The second round was a technical round, which had a few good questions. The third round was HR, which consisted of general questions.
I was placed during campus. The process is similar to other IT companies. They check your approach and solution-driven implementations. Quantitative Aptitude was a bit easy. GD was slightly tough. HR was simple and interesting.
I had applied to HSBC Software Development through the Employee Referral Program. One technical interview was taken by the Department Head. It was followed by an HR interview. The process was well organized and very systematic. I would say the int