Many really intelligent people work at IBM. High innovation and strong teamwork come naturally to anyone who focuses on their work and cares about the product(s) being developed. IBM is very serious about work/life balance.
IBM claims to "pay for performance," and they do. However, the differentiation on pay is not as strong as I would logically expect.
Over the last decade, I have observed two main areas where IBM could improve.
The process for identifying and addressing poor performers within teams seems slow. Perhaps it is bound by corporate process.
Try to limit the amount of team changes, management/executive changes, and project changes. Increased frequency of changes leads to lower morale.
Interviewed with two different hiring managers and four team members. Overall, it went well. Was very impressed with the working environment: labs, people, and etc. The questions asked were real-world questions, not from a book. Some were very tec
I didn't have a process because I looked for opportunities at university courses and then started a scholarship.
Phone call interview with HR, followed by interviews with engineers and the manager.
Interviewed with two different hiring managers and four team members. Overall, it went well. Was very impressed with the working environment: labs, people, and etc. The questions asked were real-world questions, not from a book. Some were very tec
I didn't have a process because I looked for opportunities at university courses and then started a scholarship.
Phone call interview with HR, followed by interviews with engineers and the manager.