The company, like most companies nowadays, tries to invest in diversity, tries to include people with disabilities, and has programs for that.
It tries to negotiate with banks to lower employee fees.
It has a study area that contains a good collection of content.
I worked at the company for 4 years. I saw the delivery manager treat different people according to "personal" interests.
I saw architects and team leaders yelling at developers, cursing and mistreating them, and there were no consequences.
I saw a people manager (CPG) stalking and promoting a bad image of an employee.
I saw a "leader" humiliating an intern, and the manager laughing at the situation.
I saw a manager and an architect encouraging homophobia, which is against the company's principles. They are all still at the company, unfortunately.
Demitam esses gerentes antiquados e contratem líderes que pensam nas pessoas, e que o assédio e outras formas de ataques a funcionários fiquem para a década passada.
Criem formas de avaliação bottom-up e vocês vão se impressionar com a quantidade de reclamações que vão receber de "líderes" e "gerentes" criando ambientes ruins, estimulando competitividade para eliminar funcionários, criando maus ambientes que estimulam o burnout por esforço demasiado e por pressão a funcionários.
Inclusive quem está avaliando teve burnout diagnosticado e sofreu retaliação de gerente por ter ficado doente.
It had four rounds, each of average difficulty. They also asked a lot of technical questions and required coding based on your technology stack.
I had two interviews, one technical and one with an executive, as well as a technical exam. The exam was a bit hard, but the interviews were smooth and not that difficult. The process involves taking the exam. When you pass, you then do a technical
It was quick and smooth. Only two rounds with basic technical and managerial questions. You can prepare by brushing up your basic knowledge and also some scenario-based questions. Also, brush up on behavioral questions as well.
It had four rounds, each of average difficulty. They also asked a lot of technical questions and required coding based on your technology stack.
I had two interviews, one technical and one with an executive, as well as a technical exam. The exam was a bit hard, but the interviews were smooth and not that difficult. The process involves taking the exam. When you pass, you then do a technical
It was quick and smooth. Only two rounds with basic technical and managerial questions. You can prepare by brushing up your basic knowledge and also some scenario-based questions. Also, brush up on behavioral questions as well.